Age-Based Patellofemoral Morphology in the Immature Knee

Purpose: Patellar instability (PI) is a common cause of anterior knee pain and disability in the pediatric population. The use of patellofemoral measurements on MRI provides a quantitative means for PI assessment and has now become an important diagnostic tool, but these techniques largely rely upon adult standards. Our goal is to describe morphologic trends in the skeletally immature knee and to predict the age at which adult norms can reliably be used in the evaluation of the pediatric knee. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 144 normal knee MRIs in 133 skeletally immature patients that presented between 2002 and 2014. Patients were equally distributed by age and gender with ages ranging from 1-16. MRI exclusion criteria included: moderate to severe effusions, cartilaginous defects, patellofemoral abnormalities, ligamentous injury, neoplasms, infection, congenital disease, or arthritic changes. All 1 and 2 year olds were included due to lack of MRIs and only females younger than 15 were used to account for anticipated physical closure. All measurements used cartilaginous landmarks and results were stratified based on age and gender. Each measurement was charted in a linear regression model or analyzed with Student’s t test. Results: Each measurement can reliably be performed at all ages with good interand intra observer reliability. All MR measurements were graphically represented in a linear regression model and are shown to approach adult norms with increasing age. The age at which there is no statistical difference between our pediatric patients and the adult norms is shown as the “regression cutoff”. Further t-test analysis suggests a 2nd cutoff that serves as the age at which younger should not be compared to adult norms. Conclusion: The measurements commonly used to evaluate for patellar instability in the adult population are subject to considerable variation throughout skeletal maturation. Based on our analysis, children < 10 years of age should not be compared to adult standards. Conversely, children ≥ 10 appear to have reached near patellofemoral maturation and show consistent and progressive development of patellofemoral morphology with increasing age. Significance: The ability to predict morphologic abnormalities in the first decade of life may lend to earlier surgical intervention or realignment procedures. Surgical outcomes may be augmented by remaining patellofemoral growth and remodeling, especially in those patients under 10 years of age.

[1]  J. Yang,et al.  Standardization of patellofemoral morphology in the pediatric knee , 2016, Pediatric Radiology.

[2]  I. Gal,et al.  Landmarks of the normal adult human trochlea based on axial MRI measurements: a cross-sectional study , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[3]  D. Tandberg,et al.  Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: defining normal in a pediatric population. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  P. Horn,et al.  The patellofemoral joint: do age and gender affect skeletal maturation of the osseous morphology in children? , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  S. Ward,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Topographical Differences Between Control and Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability Patients , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  S. Scheffler,et al.  Prevalence and patterns of anatomical risk factors in patients after patellar dislocation: a case control study using MRI , 2013, European Radiology.

[7]  S. Pandit,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance: normal values for males and females , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[8]  A. Chhabra,et al.  A systematised MRI approach to evaluating the patellofemoral joint , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[9]  Gerd Diederichs,et al.  MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  Alexis Colvin,et al.  Patellar instability. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  T. Rowland Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players , 2008 .

[12]  Wongwit Senavongse,et al.  Patellofemoral kinematics during knee flexion‐extension: An in vitro study , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  J. Easterbrook,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patellofemoral malalignment. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  A. V. van Huyssteen,et al.  Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea. An MRI study. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  Christian W A Pfirrmann,et al.  The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. , 2006, The Knee.

[16]  H. Dejour,et al.  Factors of patellar instability: An anatomic radiographic study , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[17]  Elizabeth W. Paxton,et al.  Epidemiology and Natural History of Acute Patellar Dislocation , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  Nogah Shabshin,et al.  MRI criteria for patella alta and baja , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[19]  J. Ogden Radiology of postnatal skeletal development , 1984, Skeletal Radiology.

[20]  A. Amis,et al.  The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove , 2004, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  J Romero,et al.  Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  D. Dejour,et al.  Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  W Rauschning,et al.  Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  V. Vécsei,et al.  Patellar alignment evaluated by MRI. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  T. Miller,et al.  Patellar height on sagittal MR imaging of the knee. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  U. Kujala,et al.  Patellofemoral relationships in recurrent patellar dislocation. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  G. Cerulli,et al.  Patellar pain and incongruence. I: Measurements of incongruence. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  A. C. Merchant,et al.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  E. Salvati,et al.  Patella position in the normal knee joint. , 1971, Radiology.

[30]  H. Brattstroem SHAPE OF THE INTERCONDYLAR GROOVE NORMALLY AND IN RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF PATELLA. A CLINICAL AND X-RAY-ANATOMICAL INVESTIGATION. , 1964, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.