Invisible Crowds in Cyberspace: Mapping the Social Structure of the Usenet

The Usenet is a quintessential Internet social phenomenon: it is huge, global, anarchic and rapidly growing. It is also mostly invisible. Although, it is the largest example of a conferencing or discussion group system, the tools generally available to access it only display leaves and branches chains of messages and responses. None present the trees and forest. With hundreds of thousands of new messages every day, it is impossible to try to read them all to get a sense of the entire place. As a result, an overview of activity in the Usenet has been difficult to assemble and many basic questions about its size, shape, structure and dynamics have gone unanswered. How big is the Usenet? How many people post? Where are they from? When and where do they post? How do groups vary from one another and over time? How many different kinds of groups are there? How many groups successfully thrive and how many die? What do the survivors have that the others lack? How do different social cyberspaces connect and fit together and form a larger ecology?

[1]  Kenneth C. Cox,et al.  3D geographic network displays , 1996, SGMD.

[2]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Talking to strangers: an evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration , 1996, CSCW '96.

[3]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Using frequency-of-mention in public conversations for social filtering , 1996, CSCW '96.

[4]  Bryan Pfaffenberger.  If I Want it, It's OK: Usenet and the (Outer) Limits of Free Speech , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Elizabeth Reid.  Informed Consent in the Study of On-Line Communities: A Reflection on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Social Research , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Dennis Waskul,et al.  Considering the Electronic Participant: Some Polemical Observations on the Ethics of On-Line Research , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[7]  Storm A. King,et al.  Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[8]  David J. Phillips.  Defending the Boundaries: Identifying and Countering Threats in a Usenet Newsgroup , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Stephen G. Eick,et al.  Aspects of network visualization , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[10]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Relationships in Electronic Forums: Hangouts, Salons, Workplaces, and Communities , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[11]  Ray R. Larson,et al.  Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An Exploratory Analysis of the Intellectual Structure of Cyberspace , 1996 .

[12]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[13]  P. Kollock,et al.  Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities , 1996 .

[14]  Charlotte Hess,et al.  Untangling the Web: The Internet as a Commons , 1996 .

[15]  Mark Harrison,et al.  The usenet handbook - a user's guide to netnews , 1995, Help for Internet users.

[16]  M Damashek,et al.  Gauging Similarity with n-Grams: Language-Independent Categorization of Text , 1995, Science.

[17]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen , 1995 .

[18]  Kenneth C. Cox,et al.  3D Displays of Internet Traffic , 1995 .

[19]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[20]  Roger Clarke,et al.  The Digital Persona and Its Application to Data Surveillance , 1994, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .

[22]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[23]  John C. Smart,et al.  Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  M. Poster.  The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context , 1990 .

[25]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[26]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  The interplay of work group structures and computer support , 1990 .

[27]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[28]  John S. Quarterman,et al.  The Matrix: Computer Networks and Conferencing Systems Worldwide , 1989 .

[29]  W. Whyte.  City: Rediscovering the Center , 1988 .

[30]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Progress, problems and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies , 1987 .

[31]  S. Kiesler.  The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[32]  James A. Danowski,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication: A Network-Based Content Analysis Using a CBBS Conference , 1982 .

[33]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: a longitudinal study of group roles and s , 1982 .

[34]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[35]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[36]  T. Shibutani.  Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor , 1966 .

[37]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .