Improving Descriptions of Single-Subject Experiments in Research Texts Written for Undergraduates

Many undergraduate research methods texts assume that single-subject experiments are (a) low in generality, (b) merely pilot studies, (c) unsuitable when treatment effects are gradual or irreversible, (d) only useful when multiple-treatment interference is low, and (e) questionable because tests of statistical significance are absent. We critically examine these misconceptions, with the goal of improving the single-subject experiment’s description in these texts and increasing its use beyond the area of behavior analysis. We subsequently compare multi-subject and single-subject experimentation in terms of research process and the alignment of psychological research with theory and practice. We conclude that psychological science and practice will be enhanced by methods texts accurately describing single-subject experiments and these texts addressing the problem of “individual-subject validity”: the extent causal relations between treatments and outcomes are assessed at the level of the single-subject.

[1]  R. Woodworth,et al.  Experimental Psychology, 3rd ed , 1957 .

[2]  M. Sidman Tactics of Scientific Research , 1960 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[4]  D. Lykken Statistical significance in psychological research. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J Michael,et al.  Statistical inference for individual organism research: mixed blessing or curse? , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  P. Cozby,et al.  Methods in behavioral research , 1977 .

[7]  P. Meehl Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[8]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  A within-subjects analysis of the relationship between memory span and processing rate in short-term memory , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  H. Pennypacker,et al.  Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research , 1980 .

[10]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[11]  J. Birnbrauer External validity and experimental investigation of individual behaviour , 1981 .

[12]  Douglas G. Mook Psychological research, strategy and tactics , 1982 .

[13]  David H. Barlow,et al.  The Scientist Practitioner: Research and Accountability in Clinical and Educational Settings , 1983 .

[14]  Single Case Research: An Added Tool for Counselors and Supervisors. , 1983 .

[15]  P. Strain,et al.  Special Educators as Single-Subject Researchers , 1983 .

[16]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation , 1983 .

[17]  M. Perone,et al.  Reduced age differences in omission errors after prolonged exposure to response pacing contingencies. , 1983 .

[18]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  S. Bradley-Johnson,et al.  Effects of token reinforcement on WISC-R performance of black and white, low socioeconomic second graders , 1984 .

[20]  D. R. Tardona,et al.  Effects of token reinforcement on wechsler intelligence scale for children revised performance of black and white low socioeconomic 2nd graders , 1984 .

[21]  Paul E. Carlson UPDATING AND BROADENING THE USE OF SINGLE SUBJECT DESIGNS IN READING , 1985 .

[22]  Leija V. McReynolds,et al.  Flexibility of Single-Subject Experimental Designs. Part III , 1986 .

[23]  Jaan Valsiner,et al.  The Individual subject and scientific psychology , 1986 .

[24]  Kathleen M. McCoy,et al.  Summary and Analysis of Oral Reading Corrective Feedback Research. , 1986 .

[25]  Research Methods in Applied Behavior Analysis , 1986 .

[26]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  The Role of the Case Study in Neuropsychological Research , 1986 .

[27]  C K Thompson,et al.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: Using flexibility to design or modify experiments. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[28]  Jaan Valsiner,et al.  Between Groups and Individuals , 1986 .

[29]  K P Kearns,et al.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[30]  Warren Thorngate,et al.  The Production, Detection, and Explanation of Behavioral Patterns , 1986 .

[31]  J Rojahn,et al.  Multiple treatment interference in the alternating treatments design as a function of the intercomponent interval length. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[32]  R. Bass The Generality, Analysis, and Assessment of Single-Subject Data. , 1987 .

[33]  I. Løvaas,et al.  The Nature of Behavioral Treatment and Research with Young Autistic Persons , 1989 .

[34]  D. Baer,et al.  Interaction effects in multielement designs: inevitable, desirable, and ignorable. , 1989, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[35]  A. Graziano,et al.  Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry , 1989 .

[36]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Introduction to behavioral research methods , 1990 .

[37]  C. Lowe,et al.  Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[38]  Sandra McCormick,et al.  A case for the use of single‐subject methodology in reading research , 1990 .

[39]  E. B. Zechmeister,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology. , 1990 .

[40]  C. Lowe,et al.  Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[41]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Graduate Training in Statistics, Methodology, and Measurement in Psychology: A Survey of PhD Programs in North America , 1990 .

[42]  Stanley R. Aeschleman,et al.  Single-subject research designs: Some misconceptions. , 1991 .

[43]  David T. Lykken,et al.  What's wrong with Psychology, anyway? , 1991 .

[44]  Michael Perone,et al.  Experimental design in the analysis of free-operant behavior. , 1991 .

[45]  The modification of delusional beliefs: A single-subject evaluation , 1992 .

[46]  M. Hersen Single case experimental designs , 1992 .

[47]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  Treatment of sentence production deficits in aphasia: A linguistic-specific approach to wh-interrogative training and generalization , 1993 .

[48]  James M. Johnston,et al.  Strategies and tactics of behavioral research , 1993 .

[49]  Lovaas Oi The development of a treatment-research project for developmentally disabled and autistic children. , 1993 .

[50]  H. Pennypacker,et al.  Strategies and tactics of behavioral research, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[51]  M. Wolery,et al.  Subject Descriptions and Single-Subject Research , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[52]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[53]  G. Heiman,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology , 1994 .

[54]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  The Bell Curve , 1994 .

[55]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[56]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Experimental psychology : contemporary methods & applications , 1995 .

[57]  J. Kestner,et al.  Representation of Behavioral Methodology in Experimental Psychology Textbooks , 1995 .

[58]  Alan Poling,et al.  Fundamentals of Behavior Analytic Research , 1995 .

[59]  F. Schmidt Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers , 1996 .

[60]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  TrainingWh-Question Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: Analysis of Argument and Adjunct Movement , 1996, Brain and Language.

[61]  Single‐case experimental designs in medical education: an innovative research method , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[62]  The problem of typological thinking in mental retardation. , 1997, Mental retardation.