Overcoming problems in house energy ratings in temperate climates: A proposed new rating framework

This paper first demonstrates that an efficient design for a house in conditioned operation mode differs from that for the same house in the free-running operation mode, and that this is a primary reason for the inability of current energy based rating schemes to adequately assess the performance of passive design in a temperate climate. We examine the Australian Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme as an example of this problem. A new practical framework for a house rating scheme is then presented. In this proposed framework, the efficiency of a house design is evaluated with reference to its thermal performance in free-running mode, in addition to its projected energy loads in conditioned operation mode. The study uses simulation to evaluate the thermal performances of houses, and employs multiregression analysis to develop the framework. The reliability of proposed framework as compared to the current energy based rating scheme is demonstrated. By attributing more value to the performance of houses in the free-running than the conditioned operation, it is assumed that policy objectives for reducing energy demand for space heating and cooling in the residential building sector are more likely to be achieved.

[1]  T. Williamson.  A critical review of home energy rating in Australia , 2000 .

[2]  M. N. Assimakopoulos,et al.  Using intelligent clustering techniques to classify the energy performance of school buildings , 2007 .

[3]  Maria Kordjamshidi,et al.  Modeling Efficient Building Design: A Comparison of Conditioned and Free-Running House Rating Approaches , 2007 .

[4]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Development of an energy rating system for existing houses , 1999 .

[5]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[6]  J. J. Bloem,et al.  HELP (house energy labeling procedure): methodology and present results , 2001 .

[7]  Wasim Saman,et al.  Estimation of the Thermal Sensitivity of a Dwelling to Variations in Architectural and Behavioural Parameters , 2003 .

[8]  Maria Kordjamshidi,et al.  Why are Rating Schemes always wrong? Regulatory frameworks for passive design and energy efficiency , 2006 .

[9]  Craig P. Wray,et al.  Residential commissioning: a review of related literature , 2000 .

[10]  Irene P. Koronaki,et al.  ORME: A multicriteria rating methodology for buildings , 2002 .

[11]  Alan Meier,et al.  Rating the energy performance of buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Henry J. Cowan.  Handbook of Architectural Technology , 1991 .

[13]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[14]  John A. Ballinger.  The 5 star design rating system for thermally efficient, comfortable housing in Australia , 1988 .

[15]  Elena G. Dascalaki,et al.  Passive retrofitting of office buildings to improve their energy performance and indoor environment: the OFFICE project , 2002 .

[16]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Essentials of educational measurement , 1972 .

[17]  Qian Xu,et al.  A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment , 2006 .

[18]  Alan Meier,et al.  Accuracy of home energy rating systems , 2000 .

[19]  Angelo Delsante,et al.  A VALIDATION OF THE 'ACCURATE' SIMULATION ENGINE USING BESTEST , 2004 .

[20]  Mat Santamouris.  Energy Performance of Residential Buildings: A Practical Guide for Energy Rating and Efficiency , 2004 .

[21]  L. M. López-González,et al.  Review of the energy rating of dwellings in the European Union as a mechanism for sustainable energy , 2006 .

[22]  Veronica Soebarto.  A low-energy house and a low rating: What is the problem? , 2000 .

[23]  Richard Aynsley.  Modeling efficient building design: A comparison of conditioned and free-running house rating approaches , 2007 .