Is digital advertising effective under conditions of low attention?

ABSTRACT A crucial task for digital advertising is to influence choice despite consumers’ lack of attention. Yet, there is little evidence about digital advertising effectiveness or about the source factors that affect consumers under conditions of low attention. Using a mixed factorial experiment, we find clear evidence that digital advertising is effective despite low attention. The results for brand familiarity and product characteristics are more nuanced; the effects are greater for unfamiliar brands, and also for familiar brands that are utilitarian. These findings are encouraging for digital advertisers who may feel released from the imperative to design attention-grabbing advertisements. However, the results also emphasise the need for advertising theory to take better account of low attention and the opportunity to further investigate the circumstances under which low-attention advertising will be most effective.

[1]  Karen Nelson-Field The Attention Economy and How Media Works: Simple Truths for Marketers , 2020 .

[2]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Digital advertising: present and future prospects , 2019, International Journal of Advertising.

[3]  Pamela M. Feetham,et al.  If you think about it more, do you want it more? The case of fairtrade , 2019 .

[4]  Fernando de Oliveira Santini,et al.  Factors influencing visual attention: a meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of Marketing Management.

[5]  Eun Soo Rhee,et al.  Brand familiarity as a moderating factor in the ad and brand attitude relationship and advertising appeals , 2019 .

[6]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[7]  Ana Alina Tudoran,et al.  Why do internet consumers block ads? New evidence from consumer opinion mining and sentiment analysis , 2019, Internet Res..

[8]  D. Belanche Ethical limits to the intrusiveness of online advertising formats: A critical review of Better Ads Standards , 2019, Journal of Marketing Communications.

[9]  K. Poels,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Advertising: A Call to Action , 2019, Journal of Advertising.

[10]  Yuping Liu-Thompkins,et al.  A Decade of Online Advertising Research: What We Learned and What We Need to Know , 2019, Journal of Advertising.

[11]  Digital Advertising And Company Value , 2018, Journal of Advertising Research.

[12]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  Special Issue Introduction: Digital Engagement with Advertising , 2018 .

[13]  Guda van Noort,et al.  Engagement with Social Media and Social Media Advertising: The Differentiating Role of Platform Type , 2018 .

[14]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Improving Consumer Mindset Metrics and Shareholder Value through Social Media: The Different Roles of Owned and Earned Media , 2018 .

[15]  M. Polonsky,et al.  Integrating social media within an integrated marketing communication decision-making framework , 2017 .

[16]  Liselot Hudders,et al.  How media multitasking reduces advertising irritation: The moderating role of the Facebook wall , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Hilde A. M. Voorveld,et al.  The Battle of the Screens: Unraveling Attention Allocation and Memory Effects When Multiscreening , 2017 .

[18]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Explicating user behavior toward multi-screen adoption and diffusion: User experience in the multi-screen media ecology , 2017, Internet Res..

[19]  Brittany R. L. Duff,et al.  Advertising (in)attention in the digital environment , 2017 .

[20]  From Advertising Avoidance to Advertising Approach: Rethinking Attention in New Advertising Formats , 2016 .

[21]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  The Role of Qualitative Research in Current Digital Social Media: Issues and Aspects—An Introduction , 2016 .

[22]  C. Fernandes,et al.  Social Media Marketing: A Literature Review and Implications , 2016 .

[23]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers’ attitudes towards brands placed in movies , 2016 .

[24]  Malcolm J. Wright,et al.  Why familiar brands are sometimes harder to remember , 2016 .

[25]  Nathaniel J. Evans,et al.  Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising , 2016 .

[26]  Gian Fulgoni In the Digital World, Not Everything That Can Be Measured Matters , 2016, Journal of Advertising Research.

[27]  Predicting what? The strengths and limitations of a test of persuasive advertising principles , 2016 .

[28]  P. Bottomley,et al.  Don't Distract Me When I'm Media Multitasking: Toward a Theory for Raising Advertising Recall and Recognition , 2016 .

[29]  Hyejin Bang,et al.  Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm-Generated Content in Social Media on Customer Behavior , 2016 .

[31]  Brittany R. L. Duff,et al.  Seeing the Big Picture: Multitasking and Perceptual Processing Influences on Ad Recognition , 2015 .

[32]  G. Trinh A stochastic model of consideration set sizes , 2015 .

[33]  Daniel Baack,et al.  Creativity, attention and the memory for brands: an outdoor advertising field study , 2015 .

[34]  Laurent Muzellec,et al.  Consumer Moments of Truth In the Digital Context , 2014, Journal of Advertising Research.

[35]  Kendall Goodrich,et al.  The Gender Gap , 2014, Journal of Advertising Research.

[36]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Selective Attention and Inattention to Products on Subsequent Choice , 2013 .

[37]  Jenni Romaniuk Modeling mental market share , 2013 .

[38]  C. Rossi-Arnaud,et al.  Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Charles r. Taylor Editorial: Hot topics in advertising research , 2013 .

[40]  Rebecca Walker Naylor,et al.  Beyond the “Like” Button: The Impact of Mere Virtual Presence on Brand Evaluations and Purchase Intentions in Social Media Settings , 2012 .

[41]  Kendall Goodrich,et al.  What's Up? , 2010, Journal of Advertising Research.

[42]  Chan Yun Yoo,et al.  Effects beyond click-through: Incidental exposure to web advertising , 2009 .

[43]  R. Heath,et al.  Emotional Engagement: How Television Builds Big Brands At Low Attention , 2009, Journal of Advertising Research.

[44]  Eileen Bridges,et al.  Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience , 2008 .

[45]  Anna Lund Jepsen,et al.  Low attention advertising processing in B2B markets , 2007 .

[46]  T. Ambler,et al.  Handbook of Advertising , 2007 .

[47]  R. Heath Reinforcement and low attention processing , 2007 .

[48]  A. Nairn,et al.  Brand Relationships: Strengthened by Emotion, Weakened by Attention , 2006, Journal of Advertising Research.

[49]  D. Berry,et al.  Implicit Memory and Consumer Choice: The Mediating Role of Brand Familiarity , 2006 .

[50]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Consumer Behavior , 2006 .

[51]  Measuring the Hidden Power of Emotive Advertising , 2005 .

[52]  Jenni Romaniuk,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring brand salience , 2004 .

[53]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[54]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[55]  Micael Dahlen,et al.  Let’s be strange: brand familiarity and ad‐brand incongruency , 2003 .

[56]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects , 2003 .

[57]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[58]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  Repetitive Advertising and the Consumer , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[60]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[61]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[62]  Thomas E. Ruggiero Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[63]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  When an Ad's Influence Is beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure , 1999 .

[64]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories , 1999 .

[65]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior , 1998 .

[66]  D. MacInnis,et al.  The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets , 1997 .

[67]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[68]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[69]  J. P. Jones Advertising: Strong Force or Weak Force? Two Views an Ocean Apart , 1990 .

[70]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Compulsive Buying: A Phenomenological Exploration , 1989 .

[71]  Banwari Mittal Measuring Purchase‐decision involvement , 1989 .

[72]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[73]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences , 1982 .

[74]  Timothy E. Moore,et al.  Subliminal Advertising: What you see is what you Get , 1982 .

[75]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[76]  E. Strong,et al.  Theories of selling. , 1925 .