High speed railway productivity : how does organizational restructuring contribute to HSR productivity growth?

The institutional reform of Japan National Railway (JNR) in 1987 has been considered as a great success. After the Japanese railway reform, European countries introduced vertical separation management. However, the question whether the new companies’ railway business has been improved by the privatization and vertical separation is still not well known. To evaluate the effect of the privatization and vertical separation, this thesis applied “productivity analysis”. First, we set Tokaido Shinkansen and the Paris-Lyon line as our research object because that these lines introduced the latest technology when it had been constructed. This means the technological development which increases the productivity has been very limited. Second, these lines have been profitable railway lines for a long time. This thesis used multi-factor productivity (MFP). We set passenger-km and revenue as output separately, and personnel, non-personnel, and capital related expenses as input data. As a result, this thesis found that the JNR privatization has contributed to increase MFP of Tokaido Shinkansen after 1987. This thesis reviewed the previous research. As a result, we figured out that their research model has difficulties showing the effect of introducing the vertical separation. From the Swedish railway data, we judged even the small market competition has more relationship with increased productivity than the style of vertical separation. We believed that the future NEC HSR should introduce private sector’s funds, and be operated by private sectors with competition within operators. Thesis Supervisor: Joseph M. Sussman Title: JR East Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems

[1]  Thomas G. Cowing,et al.  Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries , 1981 .

[2]  Paul Starr,et al.  The Meaning of Privatization , 1988 .

[3]  Europe: Alternative Models for Restructuring , 2006 .

[4]  Ginés de Rus,et al.  Is Investment in High Speed Rail Socially Profitable , 2007 .

[5]  T. S. Adams,et al.  National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. , 1920, Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association.

[6]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[7]  J. Ross,et al.  High-speed Rail: Catalyst for European Integration? , 1994 .

[8]  Stéphanie Leheis,et al.  High-speed train planning in France: Lessons from the Mediterranean TGV-line , 2009 .

[9]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  Productivity, efficiency and technical change in the European railways: A non-parametric approach , 1999 .

[10]  Robert J. Gordon,et al.  Productivity in the Transportation Sector , 1991 .

[11]  R. Vickerman High-speed rail in Europe: experience and issues for future development , 1997 .

[12]  Ginés de Rus,et al.  The Economic Effects of High Speed Rail Investment , 2008 .

[13]  J. Cowie Subsidy and Productivity in the Privatised British Passenger Railway , 2002 .

[14]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  Andrea Obermauer NATIONAL RAILWAY REFORM IN JAPAN AND THE EU: EVALUATION OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES. , 2001 .

[17]  Toshiji Takatsu The history and future of high-speed railways in Japan , 2007 .

[18]  Vicente Inglada,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain , 1997 .

[19]  José A. Gómez-Ibáñez,et al.  Competition in the Railway Industry , 2006 .

[20]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Economic Performance in Regulated and Unregulated Environments: A Comparison of U. S. and Canadian Railroads , 1981 .

[21]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Railway (De)Regulation: A European Efficiency Comparison , 2004 .

[22]  C. Martland Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry, 1980-2010 , 2012 .

[23]  Jacques Pelkmans,et al.  The Economics of EU Railway Reform , 2004 .

[24]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The Myth of Asia's Miracle , 1994 .

[25]  Javier Campos,et al.  A review of HSR experiences around the world , 2007 .