Race in Virtual Environments: Competitive Versus Cooperative Games with Black or White Avatars

Often, virtual environments and video games have established goals, and to achieve them, users must either compete or cooperate with others. The common ingroup identity model predicts that individuals maintain multiple identities at any given time based on roles, demographics, and contextual factors, and that they interpret others based on similarity (i.e., perceived ingroup) or dissimilarity (i.e., perceived outgroup) to these identities. In this experiment, we manipulated two aspects of a virtual partner's identity-race and task collaboration-to determine how users would perceive others in a virtual world. White participants (N=99) played an anagram game competitively (outgroup) or cooperatively (ingroup) in a virtual environment with a black (outgroup) or white (ingroup) virtual partner. Contrary to hypotheses, performing either task led to more positive evaluations of black avatars than white avatars.

[1]  Y. Fujioka,et al.  Television use, stereotypes of African Americans and opinions on affirmative action: An affective model of policy reasoning , 2000 .

[2]  Martin Gilens,et al.  “Race Coding” and White Opposition to Welfare , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Roger T. Johnson,et al.  Relationships Among Cooperative Learning Experiences, Social Interdependence, Children's Aggression, Victimization, and Prosocial Behaviors: INTERDEPENDENCE, AGGRESSION, AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2011 .

[4]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT. , 2004, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[5]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[6]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[7]  David R. Ewoldsen,et al.  Effect of Playing Violent Video Games Cooperatively or Competitively on Subsequent Cooperative Behavior , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias , 1990 .

[9]  Phyllis A. Anastasio,et al.  The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1993 .

[10]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  Social evaluations of embodied agents and avatars , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  J. Blascovich,et al.  Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards Black (but not White) males in an immersive virtual environment , 2009 .

[12]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world , 2009 .

[13]  Osei Appiah,et al.  Identification and the Influence of Cultural Stereotyping on Postvideogame Play Hostility , 2009 .

[14]  N. Ellemers The Group Self , 2012, Science.

[15]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Reality , 2009, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Distinctiveness-based stereotype threat and the moderating role of coaction contexts , 2012 .

[17]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  V. Groom,et al.  The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments , 2009 .

[19]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[20]  B. Bettencourt,et al.  Numerical representation and cross-cut role assignments: Majority members’ responses under cooperative interaction , 2007 .

[21]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative dimension as determinants of intergroup discrimination , 1994 .

[22]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The Impact of Cognitive Anchors on Information-Sharing Behavior , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Nina Hansen,et al.  The carry-over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prejudice towards uninvolved outgroups , 2007 .

[24]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis Quantifying the Effects of Avatars and Agents on Social Influence , 2010 .

[25]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  BRENDESHA M. TYNES,et al.  Ethnic Identity, Intergroup Contact, and Outgroup Orientation among Diverse Groups of Adolescents on the Internet , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[28]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[29]  S. Fiske,et al.  Ethnic Identity Moderates Perceptions of Prejudice: Judgments of Personal Versus Group Discrimination and Subtle Versus Blatant Bias , 2001 .

[30]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[31]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Social value orientation moderates ingroup love but not outgroup hate in competitive intergroup conflict , 2010 .

[32]  Stephen R. Burgess,et al.  Playing With Prejudice: The Prevalence and Consequences of Racial Stereotypes in Video Games , 2011 .

[33]  Brent Rossen,et al.  Virtual Humans Elicit Skin-Tone Bias Consistent with Real-World Skin-Tone Biases , 2008, IVA.

[34]  M. Sherif Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Anna Besmann,et al.  Pals in Power Armor: Attribution of Human-Like Emotions to Video Game Characters in an Ingroup/Outgroup Situation , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..