Sustainable, efficient, and equitable water use: the three pillars under wise freshwater allocation

There are many river basins in the world where human water footprint needs to be reduced substantially. This article proposes three pillars under wise freshwater allocation: water footprint caps per river basin, water footprint benchmarks per product, and fair water footprint shares per community. Water footprint caps for all river basins in the world—setting maximums to the water volumes that can be consumed or polluted by the various human activities per basin—would aim to ensure a sustainable water use within each basin. Water footprint benchmarks for water‐using processes aim to provide an incentive to producers to reduce the water footprint of their products toward reasonable benchmark levels. Benchmarks will enable the actors along supply chains—from primary producers and intermediate companies to final consumers—and governments responsible for water allocation to share information about what are ‘reasonable water footprints’ for various processes and products. The idea of a fair water footprint share per community aims to contribute to the debate about social equity. Water allocation may be environmentally sustainable and efficient from a resource point of view, but that does not automatically imply that water allocation is fair from a societal point of view. We need international agreement on what makes the water footprint of a community of consumers fair or reasonably acceptable, given the limited maximum sustainable water footprint per global citizen. WIREs Water 2014, 1:31–40. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1000

[1]  Brian Richter,et al.  A PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTION , 2012 .

[2]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers , 2012 .

[3]  Bouâbid El Mansouri,et al.  Hydrodynamic modeling for groundwater assessment in Sana’a Basin, Yemen , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[4]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Nonsustainable groundwater sustaining irrigation: A global assessment , 2012 .

[5]  R. Almond,et al.  Living planet report 2012: Biodiversity, biocapacity and better choices , 2012 .

[6]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Global Monthly Water Scarcity: Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of humanity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Carbon and water footprints : Concepts, methodologies and policy responses , 2012 .

[9]  J. Greet,et al.  Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2012 report , 2012 .

[10]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  The Water Footprint of Modern Consumer Society , 2011 .

[11]  M. Aldaya,et al.  The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .

[12]  J. Rathore Assessment of water quality of River Bandi affected by textile dyeing and printing effluents, Pali, Western Raj asthan, India , 2011 .

[13]  Kashif Mahmud,et al.  Textile Dyeing Industries in Bangladesh for Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[14]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: the global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030 , 2012 .

[15]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crops products , 2011 .

[16]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model , 2010 .

[17]  Philippus Wester,et al.  River basin closure: Processes, implications and responses , 2010 .

[18]  N. Poff,et al.  Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows , 2010 .

[19]  Terry Barker,et al.  The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy , 2009 .

[20]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[21]  Lin Crase,et al.  The paradox of national water savings: A critique of “Water for the Future” , 2009 .

[22]  Manuel Pulido-Velazquez,et al.  Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Arjen Y. Hoekstra,et al.  The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products , 2008 .

[24]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources , 2008 .

[25]  Chris Perry,et al.  Efficient irrigation; inefficient communication; flawed recommendations , 2007 .

[26]  G. Dore,et al.  The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China’s Future , 2004, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[27]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries , 2006 .

[28]  Pixie A. Hamilton,et al.  Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992-2001 , 2006 .

[29]  Leona K. Svancara,et al.  Policy-driven versus Evidence-based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs , 2005 .

[30]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Globalisation of water resources: Global virtual water flows in relation to international crop trade , 2005 .

[31]  P. Q. Hung,et al.  Globalisation of water resources : international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade , 2005 .

[32]  J. Rockström,et al.  Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology , 2004 .

[33]  J. Allan,et al.  Virtual Water - the Water, Food, and Trade Nexus. Useful Concept or Misleading Metaphor? , 2003 .

[34]  M. Binswanger Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[35]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[36]  P. Sands The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1992 .