An interactive tool for visualization of spike train synchronization

A number of studies have examined the synchronization of central and peripheral spike trains by applying signal analysis techniques in the time and frequency domains. These analyses can reveal the presence of one or more common neural inputs that produce synchronization. However, synchronization measurements can fluctuate significantly due to the inherent variability of neural discharges and a finite data record length. Moreover, the effect of these natural variations is further compounded by the number of parameters available for calculating coherence in the frequency domain and the number of indices used to quantify short-term synchronization (STS) in the time domain. The computational tool presented here provides the user with an interactive environment that dynamically calculates and displays spike train properties along with STS and coherence indices to show how these factors interact. It is intended for a broad range of users, from those who are new to synchronization to experienced researchers who want to develop more meaningful and effective computational and experimental studies. To ensure this freely available tool meets the needs of all users, there are two versions. The first is a stand-alone version for educational use that can run on any computer. The second version can be modified and expanded by researchers who want to explore more in-depth questions about synchronization. Therefore, the distribution and use of this tool should both improve the understanding of fundamental spike train synchronization dynamics and produce more efficient and meaningful synchronization studies.

[1]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. , 1989, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[2]  Marco Santello,et al.  Role of across-muscle motor unit synchrony for the coordination of forces , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Jaime de la Rocha,et al.  Supplementary Information for the article ‘ Correlation between neural spike trains increases with firing rate ’ , 2007 .

[4]  C. Brody Slow covariations in neuronal resting potentials can lead to artefactually fast cross-correlations in their spike trains. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A J Fuglevand,et al.  Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross‐correlogram. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  P H Ellaway,et al.  The source and distribution of short-term synchrony between gamma-motoneurones in the cat. , 1985, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[7]  David M. Halliday,et al.  Neural spike train synchronization indices: definitions, interpretations,and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  D M Halliday Generation and characterization of correlated spike trains. , 1998, Computers in biology and medicine.

[9]  C J De Luca,et al.  Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Generalized integrate-and-fire models of neuronal activity approximate spike trains of a detailed model to a high degree of accuracy. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  P. Ellaway,et al.  THE SOURCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SHORT-TERM SYNCHRONY BETWEEN γ-MOTONEURONES IN THE CAT , 1985 .

[13]  K. Terry,et al.  Coherence and short-term synchronization are insensitive to motor unit spike train nonstationarity , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  An extended difference of coherence test for comparing and combining several independent coherence estimates: theory and application to the study of motor units and physiological tremor , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.