Spatial and temporal movement characteristics after robotic training of arm and hand: A case study of a person with incomplete spinal cord injury

Background: Upper limb weakness is the primary concern of tetraplegic individuals who have sustained incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), to an extent that it is considered more important than standing abilities. Recent evidence of the plasticity of the brain and the spinal cord that can be enhanced by repeated practice- such as that available with robotic devices- suggest that robotic training of upper limbs can be beneficial to persons with SCI. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate an innovative rehabilitation technique using the RiceWrist, a newly developed robotic device, for a person with tetraplegia. A 24-year-old male with incomplete SCI at the C4 level, 6.5 months post-injury participated in 10 sessions of robotic training over 2 weeks. Variability of movement trajectory (spatial) and the time to complete (temporal) simple point-to-point wrist and forearm movements were collected before and after training completion to determine skill acquisition. The participant successfully completed 10 sessions of robotic training. While there were minimal changes in variability of movement trajectory, great improvements were observed for the average movement time for the majority of wrist and forearm movements. Overall, results suggest that the RiceWrist robotic device could be used for upper-limb rehabilitation and can potentially serve as an assessment tool for the SCI population.

[1]  Imre Cikajlo,et al.  Universal Haptic Drive: A Robot for Arm and Wrist Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation , 1985 .

[3]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  A. Gentile,et al.  Skill acquisition : Action, movement, and neuromotor processes , 1987 .

[5]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[6]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  V. Dietz,et al.  Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[8]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Massed Practice versus Massed Practice with Stimulation: Effects on Upper Extremity Function and Cortical Plasticity in Individuals with Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Wrist rehabilitation following stroke: initial clinical results , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[10]  Apostolos P Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive motor control: spatial and temporal aspects , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  H. V. van Hedel,et al.  Upper Extremity Function in Persons with Tetraplegia: Relationships Between Strength, Capacity, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  Marcia K. O'Malley,et al.  Design of a Haptic Arm Exoskeleton for Training and Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[13]  Ranu Jung,et al.  Activity-dependent plasticity in spinal cord injury. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  B. Bussel,et al.  Kinematics of prehension and pointing movements in C6 quadriplegic patients , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[15]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  A robot for wrist rehabilitation , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Allen W. Wiegner,et al.  Effects of weak antagonist on fast elbow flexion movements in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Roberta Klatzky,et al.  Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[19]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[21]  M. Jannink,et al.  Systematic review of the effects of exercise therapy on the upper extremity of patients with spinal-cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[22]  R L Lieber,et al.  Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[23]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Functional and Corticomotor Changes in Individuals With Tetraplegia Following Unimanual or Bimanual Massed Practice Training With Somatosensory Stimulation: A Pilot Study , 2010, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[24]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures , 2007, Spinal Cord.