Selective attention to elements in working memory.

Three experiments with an arithmetic working memory task examine the object switch effect first reported by Garavan (1998), which was interpreted as evidence for a focus of attention within working memory. Experiments 1a and 1b showed object switch costs with a task that requires selective access to items in working memory, but did not involve counting, and did not require updating of working memory contents, thus ruling out two alternative explanations of Garavan's results. Experiment 2 showed object switch costs with a task that required no selective access to working memory contents, but involved updating, thus providing evidence for a second component to the overall object switch costs. Further analyses revealed that the object switch cost increased with memory set size; that there were (smaller) switch costs when the switch was to an item of the same type; that repeating an arithmetic operation does not have the same effect as repeating the object it is applied to; and that object switching is not mediated by backward inhibition of the previously focused object.

[1]  D. Yntema,et al.  Keeping track of variables that have few or many states. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[6]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[7]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. , 1994 .

[8]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[9]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[10]  A. Baddeley.  Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[11]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[13]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[14]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[15]  R N Henson,et al.  Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[17]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  G J Hitch,et al.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[19]  G. Hitch,et al.  What limits children's working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Dissociating retention and access in working memory: An age-comparative study of mental arithmetic , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Herbert Hagendorf,et al.  The Role of Task Context for Component Processes in Focus Switching , 2002 .

[22]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.