Source and destination memory in face-to-face interaction: A multinomial modeling approach.

Arguing that people are often in doubt concerning to whom they have presented what information, Gopie and MacLeod (2009) introduced a new memory component, destination memory: remembering the destination of output information (i.e., "Who did you tell this to?"). They investigated source (i.e., "Who told you that?") versus destination memory in computer-based imagined interactions. The present study investigated destination memory in real interaction situations. In 2 experiments with mixed-gender (N = 53) versus same-gender (N = 89) groups, source and destination memory were manipulated by creating a setup similar to speed dating. In dyads, participants completed phrase fragments with personal information, taking turns. At recognition, participants decided whether fragments were new or old and, if old, whether they were listened to or spoken and which depicted person was the source or the destination of the information. A multinomial model was used for analyses. Source memory significantly exceeded destination memory, whereas information itself was better remembered in the destination than in the source condition. These findings corroborate the trade-off hypothesis: Context is better remembered in input than in output events, but information itself is better remembered in output than in input events. We discuss the implications of these findings for real-world conversation situations.

[1]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Determ inants of Positive and Negative Generation Effects in Free Recall , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Production benefits both recollection and familiarity , 2011, Memory & Cognition.

[3]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[5]  K C Klauer,et al.  Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality monitoring vs. discriminating between external sources of memories , 1980 .

[7]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[8]  R. Marsh,et al.  Comparisons of target output monitoring and source input monitoring , 2002 .

[9]  A. Gutchess,et al.  Source memory for action in young and older adults: self vs. close or unknown others. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[10]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial Modeling and the Measurement of Cognitive Processes , 2001 .

[11]  A. Koriat,et al.  The contextualization of input and output events in memory , 1991 .

[12]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Memory for multidimensional source information. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  M. Brand,et al.  Observation Inflation , 2010, Psychological science.

[14]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[15]  Melanie C Steffens,et al.  Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Tracking conversational repetition: an evaluation of target monitoring ability , 2006 .

[17]  D. Knutsen,et al.  Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  P. Kollock,et al.  Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties , 1985 .

[19]  C. Macrae,et al.  Contexts of Cryptomnesia: May the Source Be with You , 1999 .

[20]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Positive and Negative Generation Effects in Source Monitoring , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  A. Shimamura,et al.  Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[22]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  Analysis of a Model for Source Monitoring , 1994 .

[23]  N. Mulligan Generation and memory for contextual detail. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[25]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[26]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Destination Memory Stop Me if I’ve Told You This Before , 2022 .

[29]  T. Davis,et al.  Age differences in conversational source monitoring. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[30]  T. Perfect,et al.  Source credibility and idea improvement have independent effects on unconscious plagiarism errors in recall and generate-new tasks. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  A G Greenwald,et al.  The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[32]  R. Reagan Destination memory in Alzheimer's Disease: when I imagine telling Ronald Reagan about Paris , 2017 .

[33]  J. Engelkamp Memory for actions , 1998 .

[34]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[35]  N. Mulligan Generation Disrupts Memory for Intrinsic Context but not Extrinsic Context , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  F. Craik,et al.  Destination memory impairment in older people. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Measuring source memory , 2007 .

[38]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[39]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[40]  J B Miller,et al.  Memory for conversation. , 1996, Memory.

[41]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  On the generality of some memory laws , 1981 .

[42]  P. Davidson,et al.  Source and destination memory: Two sides of the same coin? , 2015, Memory.