Stable stochastic capacity expansion with variable renewables: Comparing moment matching and stratified scenario generation sampling

Abstract This paper examines the importance of including operational scenarios representing short-term stochasticity in the long-term capacity expansion models with high shares of variable renewables. As scenario generation routines often are probabilistic, for example based on sampling, it is crucial that they ensure stable results in the capacity expansion model, so that it is the underlying uncertainty that decides the optimal solution, and not the approximation of that uncertainty in the model. However, it is unclear which operational scenario properties that are important to ensure good results and stability in stochastic models. This paper evaluates three sampling-based scenario generation routines in a multi-horizon stochastic capacity expansion problem representing the European electricity system. We compare the use of stochastic versus deterministic modelling with high shares of variable renewables. Further, we perform in-sample and out-of-sample stability tests on 90 scenario trees for each routine, and we compare the routines’ ability to produce stable system costs and capacity investments when approximating the optimal value from the real distribution. Results show that stochastic modelling with more than 80% share of variable renewables leads to more investments in both dispatchable and variable renewable capacity compared to deterministic modelling, which means that stochastic modelling should be used with very high shares of variable renewables. The scenario generation routine based on stratified sampling increases stability with the same number of operational scenarios compared to its alternatives, and scenario generation routines using stratified sampling should be further explored.

[1]  M. Haller,et al.  Fluctuating renewables in a long-term climate change mitigation strategy , 2011 .

[2]  Asgeir Tomasgard,et al.  Heat and electric vehicle flexibility in the European power system: A case study of Norwegian energy communities , 2021 .

[3]  Michal Kaut,et al.  A Heuristic for Moment-Matching Scenario Generation , 2003, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[4]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Capacity expansion of stochastic power generation under two-stage electricity markets , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  D. Ernst,et al.  Multistage Stochastic Programming: A Scenario Tree Based Approach to Planning under Uncertainty , 2011 .

[6]  Gerard Doorman,et al.  The impact of Zero Energy Buildings on the Scandinavian energy system , 2017 .

[7]  Esteban Gil,et al.  Generation Capacity Expansion Planning Under Hydro Uncertainty Using Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming and Scenario Reduction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python , 2011, Math. Program. Comput..

[9]  Xiaobao Yu,et al.  Cross‐regional integrated energy system scheduling optimization model considering conditional value at risk , 2020, International Journal of Energy Research.

[10]  Marco Nicolosi,et al.  The Importance of High Temporal Resolution in Modeling Renewable Energy Penetration Scenarios , 2011 .

[11]  David W. Coit,et al.  Stochastic optimization for electric power generation expansion planning with discrete climate change scenarios , 2016 .

[12]  Audun Botterud,et al.  Long-term uncertainties in generation expansion planning: Implications for electricity market modelling and policy , 2021, Energy.

[13]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering , 2003 .

[14]  F. Wagner,et al.  Short-term solar and wind variability in long-term energy system models - A European case study , 2020, Energy.

[15]  Marco Cuturi,et al.  On Wasserstein Two-Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Tests , 2015, Entropy.

[16]  Ping-an Zhong,et al.  Scenario tree reduction in stochastic programming with recourse for hydropower operations , 2015 .

[17]  Paul H. Anderson Distributions in Stratified Sampling , 1942 .

[18]  Claudia A. Sagastizábal,et al.  Optimal scenario tree reduction for stochastic streamflows in power generation planning problems , 2010, Optim. Methods Softw..

[19]  M. Demuzere,et al.  Should future wind speed changes be taken into account in wind farm development? , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[20]  R. Pasupathy,et al.  A Guide to Sample Average Approximation , 2015 .

[21]  H. Auer,et al.  Erratum to: Development and modelling of different decarbonization scenarios of the European energy system until 2050 as a contribution to achieving the ambitious 1.5 ∘C climate target—establishment of open source/data modelling in the European H2020 project openENTRANCE , 2020, e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik.

[22]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Multi-year stochastic generation capacity expansion planning under environmental energy policy , 2016 .

[23]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[24]  A. Tomasgard,et al.  The impact of policy actions and future energy prices on the cost-optimal development of the energy system in Norway and Sweden , 2017 .

[25]  Ove Wolfgang,et al.  Hydro reservoir handling in Norway before and after deregulation , 2009 .

[26]  Ronald Hochreiter,et al.  Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[27]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review , 2017 .

[28]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[29]  Asgeir Tomasgard,et al.  A stochastic model for scheduling energy flexibility in buildings , 2015 .

[30]  David A. Hennessy,et al.  Capacity choice in a two-stage problem under uncertainty , 1999 .

[31]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Outlook of the EU energy system up to 2050: The case of scenarios prepared for European Commission's “clean energy for all Europeans” package using the PRIMES model , 2018, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[32]  Christoph Weber,et al.  The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis , 2014 .

[33]  Helena Marzo-Ortega,et al.  Corrigendum: Dense genotyping of immune-related susceptibility loci reveals new insights into the genetics of psoriatic arthritis , 2015, Nature Communications.

[34]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[35]  Abbas Khosravi,et al.  A computational framework for uncertainty integration in stochastic unit commitment with intermittent renewable energy sources , 2015 .

[36]  Martin Wild,et al.  The impact of climate change on photovoltaic power generation in Europe , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  Gerard Doorman,et al.  The future European power system under a climate policy regime , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[38]  D. L. Woodruff,et al.  Modeling and solving a large-scale generation expansion planning problem under uncertainty , 2011 .

[39]  Michal Kaut,et al.  Multi-horizon stochastic programming , 2014, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[40]  S. Wallace,et al.  Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming , 2007 .

[41]  Richard J. Giglio,et al.  Stochastic Capacity Models , 1970 .

[42]  Peter M. Haugan,et al.  A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[43]  Asgeir Tomasgard,et al.  Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market , 2019, Energies.

[44]  Michael C. Caramanis,et al.  The Introduction of Non-Dispatchable Technologies as Decision Variables in Long-Term Generation Expansion Models , 1982, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[45]  Maria Grazia Speranza,et al.  Conditional value-at-risk beyond finance: a survey , 2020, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[46]  Byman Hikanyona Hamududu,et al.  Assessing climate change impacts on global hydropower. , 2012 .

[47]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models , 2016 .

[48]  A. Tomasgard,et al.  Sample average approximation and stability tests applied to energy system design , 2019, Energy Systems.

[49]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems , 2015 .

[50]  A. Tomasgard,et al.  Short-term uncertainty in long-term energy system models — A case study of wind power in Denmark , 2015 .

[51]  Georg Ch. Pflug,et al.  Scenario tree generation for multiperiod financial optimization by optimal discretization , 2001, Math. Program..

[52]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Temporal Versus Stochastic Granularity in Thermal Generation Capacity Planning With Wind Power , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[53]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data , 2016 .

[54]  Peter Kall,et al.  Stochastic Programming , 1995 .

[55]  E. Cerdá,et al.  Climate change impacts on renewable energy generation. A review of quantitative projections , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[56]  James E. Smith Moment Methods for Decision Analysis , 1993 .

[57]  Hannele Holttinen,et al.  The impact of large scale wind power production on the Nordic electricity system , 2004 .

[58]  Jitka Dupacová,et al.  Scenario reduction in stochastic programming , 2003, Math. Program..

[59]  Paresh Date,et al.  An algorithm for moment-matching scenario generation with application to financial portfolio optimisation , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output , 2016 .

[61]  Narendra Karmarkar,et al.  A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming , 1984, STOC '84.

[62]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Implications of short-term renewable energy resource intermittency in long-term power system planning , 2018, Energy Strategy Reviews.