Non-linear partial derivative and its De Wolf approximation for non-linear seismic inversion

S U M M A R Y We demonstrate that higher order Frechet derivatives are not negligible and the linear Frechet derivativemay not be appropriate inmany cases, especially when forward scattering is involved for large-scale or strong perturbations (heterogeneities). We then introduce and derive the nonlinear partial derivative including all the higher order Frechet derivatives for the acoustic wave equation. We prove that the higher order Frechet derivatives can be realized by consecutive applications of the scattering operator and a zero-order propagator to the source. The full non-linear partial derivative is directly related to the full scattering series. The formulation of the full non-linear derivative can be used to non-linearly update the model. It also provides a new way for deriving better approximations beyond the linear Frechet derivative (Born approximation). In the second part of the paper, we derive the De Wolf approximation (DWA; multiple forescattering and single backscattering approximation) for the non-linear partial derivative. We split the linear derivative operator (i.e. the scattering operator) into forward and backward derivatives, and then reorder and renormalize the multiple scattering series before making the approximation of dropping the multiple backscattering terms. This approximation can be useful for both theoretical derivation and numerical calculation. Through both theoretical analyses and numerical simulations, we show that for large-scale perturbations, the errors of the linear Frechet derivative (Born approximation) are significant and unacceptable. In contrast, the DWAnon-linear partial derivative (NLPD), can give fairly accurate waveforms. Application of the NLPD to the least-square inversion leads to a different inversion algorithm than the standard gradient method.

[1]  Erhard Wielandt,et al.  Multiple Forward Scattering of Surface Waves: Comparison With an Exact Solution and Born Single-Scattering Methods , 1993 .

[2]  Kung-Ching Chang Methods in nonlinear analysis , 2005 .

[3]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  Wave-equation reflection tomography: annihilators and sensitivity kernels , 2006 .

[4]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory , 1996 .

[5]  R. Wu,et al.  Scattering characteristics of elastic waves by an elastic heterogeneity , 2010 .

[6]  Birsen Yazici,et al.  Born expansion and Fréchet derivatives in nonlinear Diffuse Optical Tomography , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[7]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  On the computation of long period seismograms in a 3-D earth using normal mode based approximations , 2008 .

[8]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[9]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three‐dimensional sensitivity kernels for surface wave observables , 2004 .

[10]  Toshiro Tanimoto,et al.  Waveforms of long-period body waves in a slightly aspherical earth model , 1993 .

[11]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Non‐linear 3‐D Born shear waveform tomography in Southeast Asia , 2012 .

[12]  Patrick Joly,et al.  Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation Phenomena , 1991 .

[13]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Scattering characteristics of elastic waves by an elastic heterogeneity , 1985 .

[14]  D. A. de Wolf,et al.  Electromagnetic reflection from an extended turbulent medium: Cumulative forward-scatter single-backscatter approximation , 1971 .

[15]  Jean Charles Gilbert,et al.  Numerical Optimization: Theoretical and Practical Aspects , 2003 .

[16]  Hui Yang,et al.  The finite-frequency sensitivity kernel for migration residual moveout and its applications in migration velocity analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[18]  K. Deimling Nonlinear functional analysis , 1985 .

[19]  W. Friederich Propagation of seismic shear and surface waves in a laterally heterogeneous mantle by multiple forward scattering , 1999 .

[20]  R. Wu,et al.  Modeling elastic wave forward propagation and reflection using the complex screen method. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[22]  Li Zhao,et al.  Multiscale finite-frequency Rayleigh wave tomography of the Kaapvaal craton , 2007 .

[23]  Guy Chavent,et al.  Migration‐based traveltime waveform inversion of 2-D simple structures: A synthetic example , 2001 .

[24]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Wide-angle elastic wave one-way propagation in heterogeneous media and an elastic wave complex-screen method , 1994 .

[25]  R. Wu Synthetic seismograms in heterogeneous media by one-return approximation , 1996 .

[26]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  On sensitivity kernels for ‘wave-equation’ transmission tomography , 2005 .

[27]  A. Tarantola A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data , 1986 .

[28]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Three‐dimensional Fréchet differential kernels for seismicdelay times , 2000 .

[29]  M. Schetzen The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems , 1980 .

[30]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Solving or resolving global tomographic models with spherical wavelets, and the scale and sparsity of seismic heterogeneity , 2011 .

[31]  A. Berkhout,et al.  Applied Seismic Wave Theory , 1987 .

[32]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Seismic waveform modelling in a 3-D Earth using the Born approximation: Potential shortcomings and a remedy , 2009 .

[33]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Inferring upper-mantle structure by full waveform tomography with the spectral element method , 2011 .

[34]  Jean Virieux,et al.  An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics , 2009 .

[35]  D. A. de Wolf Correction to "Renormalization of EM fields in application to large-angle scattering from randomly continuous media and sparse particle distributions" , 1985 .

[36]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Generalization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves , 2000 .

[37]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Robust Multichannel Blind Deconvolution via Fast Alternating Minimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Ignace Loris,et al.  Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[39]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes—I. Theory , 2000 .

[40]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes: the banana–doughnut paradox , 1999 .

[41]  Robert H. Stolt,et al.  Seismic migration : theory and practice , 1986 .

[42]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite‐frequency traveltimes—II. Examples , 2000 .

[43]  F. A. Dahlen,et al.  Resolution limit of traveltime tomography , 2004 .

[44]  R. Wu,et al.  Chapter 2. One-Return Propagators and the Applications in Modeling and Imaging , 2012 .

[45]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Comment on ‘On sensitivity kernels for ‘wave-equation’ transmission tomography’ by de Hoop and van der Hilst , 2005 .

[46]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Analytical Foundations of Volterra Series , 1984 .

[47]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Surface wave sensitivity: mode summation versus adjoint SEM , 2011 .

[48]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Wave Propagation, Scattering and Imaging Using Dual-Domain One-Way and One-Return Propagators , 2002 .

[49]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling , 1995 .

[50]  F. A. Dahlen,et al.  Finite-frequency sensitivity kernels for boundary topography perturbations , 2004 .

[51]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRÉCHET DERIVATIVES AND SENSITIVITIES FOR THE NON‐LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY1 , 1990 .