Rainfall-runoff modeling in a flashy tropical watershed using the distributed HL-RDHM model

Summary Many watersheds in Hawai‘i are flash flood prone due to their small contributing areas and frequent intense rainfall. Motivated by the possibility of developing an operational flood forecasting system, this study evaluated the performance of the National Weather Service (NWS) model, the Hydrology Laboratory Research Distributed Hydrologic Model (HL-RDHM) in simulating the hydrology of the flood-prone Hanalei watershed in Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i. This rural watershed is very wet and has strong spatial rainfall gradients. Application of HL-RDHM to Hanalei watershed required (i) modifying the Hydrologic Rainfall Analysis Project (HRAP) coordinate system; (ii) generating precipitation grids from rain gauge data, and (iii) generating parameters for Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA) and routing parameter grids for the modified HRAP coordinate system. Results were obtained for several spatial resolutions. Hourly basin-average rainfall calculated from one HRAP resolution grid (4 km × 4 km) was too low and inaccurate. More realistic rainfall and more accurate streamflow predictions were obtained with the ½ and ¼ HRAP grids. For a one year period with the best precipitation data, the performance of HL-RDHM was satisfactory even without calibration for basin-averaged and distributed a priori parameter grids. Calibration and validation of HL-RDHM were conducted using four-year data set each. The model reasonably matched the observed peak discharges and time to peak during calibration and validation periods. The performance of model was assessed using the following three statistical measures: Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and Percent bias (PBIAS). Overall, HL-RDHM’s performance was “very good (NSE > 0.75, PBIAS  3  s −1 ) than at the higher ones (140 and 248 m 3  s −1 ) as indicated by lower values of probability of detection and critical success index, and a higher value of the false alarm ratio. These results suggest that HL-RDHM may be suitable for flood forecasting applications in watersheds with steep terrain and strong spatio-temporal variability of precipitation, e.g. US Pacific North-West, and tropical islands.

[1]  Assessing Rainfall Data Homogeneity and Estimating Missing Records in Mākaha Valley, O`ahu, Hawai`i , 2010 .

[2]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A spatial regularization approach to parameter estimation for a distributed watershed model , 2008 .

[3]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A process‐based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model , 2008 .

[4]  Victor Koren,et al.  Parameterization of distributed hydrological models: learning from the experiences of lumped modeling , 2006 .

[5]  Uwe Haberlandt,et al.  Geostatistical interpolation of hourly precipitation from rain gauges and radar for a large-scale extreme rainfall event , 2007 .

[6]  Michael Smith,et al.  Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service , 2004 .

[7]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[8]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[9]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Multiobjective sensitivity analysis to understand the information content in streamflow observations for distributed watershed modeling , 2009 .

[10]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  GSTAT: a program for geostatistical modelling, prediction and simulation , 1998 .

[11]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system , 2004, Journal of Hydrology.

[12]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Effect of rainfall‐sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods , 1994 .

[13]  A. Fares,et al.  Comparison of Rainfall Interpolation Methods in a Mountainous Region of a Tropical Island , 2011 .

[14]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  Use of a Priori Parameter Estimates in the Derivation of Spatially Consistent Parameter Sets of Rainfall‐Runoff Models , 2013 .

[15]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall‐runoff models using global sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[16]  Victor Koren,et al.  Use of Soil Property Data in the Derivation of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters , 2000 .

[17]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[18]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  A Hydrologic/Water Quality Model Applicati1 1 , 2007 .

[19]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[20]  P. Reed,et al.  Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification , 2008 .

[21]  J. Schaake,et al.  A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations , 2007 .

[22]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part III - The Ray catchment at Grendon Underwood , 1970 .