Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect.

We investigate the effect of seed predation on the coexistence of competing annual plants. We demonstrate a role for predation that is opposite to the conventional wisdom that predation promotes coexistence by reducing the intensity of competition. In the common situation where competitive coexistence involves intraspecific competition exceeding interspecific competition, predation can undermine coexistence by reducing the overall magnitude of competition, replacing competition with "apparent competition" in a way that does not lead to differential intraspecific and interspecific effects. We demonstrate this outcome in the case where coexistence occurs by "the storage effect" in a variable environment. The storage effect arises when the environment interacts with competition to create opportunities for species to increase from low density. Critical to the storage effect is positive covariance between the response of population growth to the environment and its response to competition, when a species is at high density. This outcome prevents species at high density from taking advantage of favorable environmental conditions. A species at low density has lower covariance and can take advantage of favorable environmental conditions, giving it an advantage over a high-density species, fostering its recovery from low density. Hence, species coexistence is promoted. Here we find that density-dependent predation lowers population densities, and so weakens competition, replacing competition with apparent competition, which does not covary with the environment. As a consequence, covariance between environment and competition is weakened, reducing the advantage to a species at low density. The species still strongly interact through the combination of competition and apparent competition, but the reduced low-density advantage reduces their ability to coexist. Although this result is demonstrated specifically for the storage effect with a focus on annual plant communities, the principles involved are general ones.

[1]  Jan Eisner,et al.  Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics III. , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  P. Abrams.  Density-Independent Mortality and Interspecific Competition: A Test of Pianka's Niche Overlap Hypothesis , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  Control of a Desert-Grassland Transition by a Keystone Rodent Guild , 1990, Science.

[4]  James B. Grace,et al.  Components of resource competition in plant communities. , 1990 .

[5]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Predation on mutualists can reduce the strength of trophic cascades. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[6]  Helene C. Muller-Landau,et al.  When do Localized Natural Enemies Increase Species Richness , 2005 .

[7]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Predation‐Competition Interactions for Seasonally Recruiting Species , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[9]  T. Valone,et al.  The effects of vertebrate granivores and folivores on plant community structure in the Chihuahuan Desert , 1995 .

[10]  James P. Grover,et al.  The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis , 2002 .

[11]  P. Chesson.  Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[12]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  IS PREDATOR‐MEDIATED COEXISTENCE POSSIBLE INUNSTABLE SYSTEMS? , 1999 .

[13]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trophic cascades across ecosystems , 2005, Nature.

[14]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Jean Chesson,et al.  The Estimation and Analysis of Preference and Its Relatioship to Foraging Models , 1983 .

[16]  K. Wiegand,et al.  Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments , 2004, Oecologia.

[17]  S. Ellner,et al.  Convergence to stationary distributions in two-species stochastic competition models , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  Vlastimil Křivan,et al.  Competitive co-existence caused by adaptive predators , 2003 .

[19]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: a field test of the storage effect. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G. Davidowitz.  Does precipitation variability increase from mesic to xeric biomes , 2002 .

[22]  R. Holt,et al.  Disentangling Resource and Apparent Competition: Realistic Models for Plant-herbivore Communities , 1998 .

[23]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[24]  R. Holt.  Density-independent mortality, non-linear competitive interactions, and species coexistence , 1985 .

[25]  V. Hutson.  Predator mediated coexistence with a switching predator , 1984 .

[26]  S. Ernest,et al.  Rodents, plants, and precipitation: spatial and temporal dynamics of consumers and resources , 2000 .

[27]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[28]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Species Packing and Predation Pressure , 1975 .

[30]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Host–parasitoid population dynamics , 2000 .

[31]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities , 1988 .

[32]  S. Collins,et al.  Bottom-up regulation of plant community structure in an aridland ecosystem. , 2006, Ecology.

[33]  D. L. Venable,et al.  DORMANCY AND GERMINATION IN A GUILD OF SONORAN DESERT ANNUALS , 2004 .

[34]  R. Bustamante,et al.  Assessing frequency-dependent seed size selection: a field experiment , 2004 .

[35]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[36]  Mark Rees,et al.  Effects of Temporal Variability on Rare Plant Persistence in Annual Systems , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[37]  C. E. Pake,et al.  Seed Banks in Desert Annuals: Implications for Persistence and Coexistence in Variable Environments , 1996 .

[38]  M. Hassell,et al.  Predation in multi-prey communities. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  W. Ricker.  Stock and Recruitment , 1954 .

[40]  C. E. Pake,et al.  Is Coexistence of Sonoran Desert Annuals Mediated by Temporal Variability Reproductive Success , 1995 .

[41]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[42]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[43]  James H. Brown,et al.  GRANIVORY IN A DESERT ECOSYSTEM: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR INDIRECT FACILITATION OF ANTS BY RODENTS' , 1984 .

[44]  D. Davidson,et al.  Granivory in the Chihuahuan Desert : interactions within and between trophic levels , 1985 .

[45]  Tarja Oksanen,et al.  The Logic and Realism of the Hypothesis of Exploitation Ecosystems , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[46]  M. Turelli,et al.  A reexamination of stability in randomly varying versus deterministic environments with comments on the stochastic theory of limiting similarity. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[47]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models , 1989 .

[48]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[49]  Peter Chesson,et al.  New methods for quantifying the spatial storage effect: an illustration with desert annuals. , 2007, Ecology.

[50]  James H. Brown,et al.  Rain and Rodents: Complex Dynamics of Desert Consumers , 2002 .

[51]  P. Chesson,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN SEED BIOLOGY OF ANNUAL PLANTS IN ARID LANDS: A KEY INGREDIENT OF THE STORAGE EFFECT , 2005 .