Analysis of information exchange activities to actualize and validate situation awareness during shift changeovers in nuclear power plants

Shift work situations occur in almost all safety-critical organizations, and the investigations of some catastrophes like Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, and the Gol/Legacy mid-air collision indicated that shift work information exchange played an important role during the evolution of the situation before the accidents. Inadequate communications during shift changeovers challenged operators' work in the moments that preceded these accidents, because they got inadequate information about the current situation. Our research focuses on the information exchange activities (verbal, written, and nonverbal) of nuclear power plant control operators during shift changeovers. Our aim is to investigate how verbal exchanges and other representations enable operator crews to share information regarding the events that occurred in the previous shift to achieve adequate situation awareness. Our findings indicated the importance and richness of the information exchange during the shift changeover process to update and validate individual and collective situation awareness, showing that information adequately shared enables the ad hoc configurations of regulation loops and a safer use of simplified strategies that can be understood and be validated by other operators, reducing the occurrence of cognitive overloads and contributing to the construction of a common cognitive ground that enhances system resilience. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Nadine Sarter,et al.  Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain , 2009 .

[2]  M. Bourrier.  Le nucléaire à l'épreuve de l'organisation , 1999 .

[3]  Isaac José Antonio Luquetti dos Santos,et al.  Collective work and resilience of complex systems , 2009 .

[4]  Mike Schneider,et al.  Modeling Shared Situation Awareness , 2005 .

[5]  J. Piaget,et al.  The equilibration of cognitive structures : the central problem of intellectual development , 1985 .

[6]  Karl E. Weick.  Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power IndustryShouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry, by PerinConstance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004. , 2006 .

[7]  José Orlando Gomes,et al.  Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[9]  Corinne Grusenmeyer,et al.  Les mécanismes coopératifs en jeu dans les communications de travail : Un cadre méthodologique , 1997 .

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING TEAM SA AND COLLABORATION IN ARMY OPERATIONS , 2003 .

[11]  Constance Perin,et al.  Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry , 2004 .

[12]  Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho,et al.  Nuclear power plant communications in normative and actual practice: A field study of control room operators' communications , 2007 .

[13]  José Orlando Gomes,et al.  Normal people working in normal organizations with normal equipment: system safety and cognition in a mid-air collision. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Paul Wilson,et al.  Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1991 .

[15]  D. Vaughan.  The Trickle-Down Effect: Policy Decisions, Risky Work , 1997 .

[16]  John M. Flach,et al.  Cognitive Engineering: Designing for Situation Awareness , 2000 .

[17]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Transparency and awareness in a real-time groupware system , 1992, UIST '92.

[18]  Paul Swuste,et al.  “You will only see it, if you understand it” or occupational risk prevention from a management perspective , 2008 .

[19]  Isaac José Antonio Luquetti dos Santos,et al.  Nuclear power plant shift supervisor's decision making during microincidents , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[21]  Scott A. Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq , 2001 .

[22]  M. Favier,et al.  L'évolution de la conscience collective au sein des équipes projet virtuelles: une étude longitudinale , 2005 .

[23]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Resilience and brittleness in the offshore helicopter transportation system: The identification of constraints and sacrifice decisions in pilots' work , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Human factors approach for evaluation and redesign of human-system interfaces of a nuclear power plant simulator , 2008, Displays.

[25]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[26]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  The design and building of the graphic user interface for the collaborative desktop , 1995, Comput. Graph..

[27]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[28]  R. Amalberti.  LA MAITRISE DES SITUATIONS DYNAMIQUES , 2001 .

[29]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[30]  J. Hoc,et al.  Diagnostic et prise de décision dans les situations dynamiques , 1994 .

[31]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Cooperative Work and its Articulation: Requirements for Computer Support , 1994 .

[32]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Béatrice Cahour,et al.  Conscience périphérique et travail coopératif dans un café-restaurant , 2005 .

[34]  Victoria Konidari.  La conscience collective : condition sine qua none pour les équipes apprenantes , 2005 .

[35]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness , 1995 .

[36]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Micro incident analysis framework to assess safety and resilience in the operation of safe critical systems: A case study in a nuclear power plant , 2008 .

[37]  M. Vidal,et al.  Safety implications of cultural and cognitive issues in nuclear power plant operation. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.