Organic-inorganic Interfaces for a New Generation of Hybrid Biosensors

Biosensors have by far moved from laboratories benches to the point of use, and, in some cases, their represent technical standards and commercial successes in applications of social interest, such as medical diagnostic or environmental monitoring. Based on biological molecules, but also on their bio-inspired synthetic counterparts, biosensors employ different transducers (optical, potentiometric, volt-amperometric, colorimetric, and so on) converting the molecular interaction information into a measurable electric signal. As the result of a real multi-disciplinary field of science and technology, biosensors can take advantage from each improvement and progress coming from other disciplines: new features and better performances have been reached in the last year due to simplified fabrication methodologies, deep integration of optical or electrical transducers, and, last but not least, microfluidic circuits. More recently, nanostructured components dramatically increased biosensors reliability especially in public health and environmental monitoring. Nevertheless, there is still a pressing demand of innovations which could lead to smaller, faster, and cheaper biosensors systems with ability to provide not only accurate information but also feedback actions to the real world. The fabrication of a new generation of hybrid biodevices, where biological, or bio-inspired, molecules are fully integrated with a micro or a nano technological platform, strongly depends on the bio-compatibilization treatments of the devices surfaces. The design and the realization of bio/non-bio interfaces with specific properties, such as chemical stability, wettability, and biomolecules immobilization ability, are key features in the miniaturization and optimization processes of biosensors. In particular, protein immobilization is a hot topic in biotechnology since commercial solutions, as in the case of DNA microarrays, are not still available. Proteins are, due to their composition, a class of very heterogeneous macromolecules with variable properties. For these reasons, it is extremely difficult to find a common surface suitable for different proteins with a broad range in molecular weight and physical–chemical properties such as charge and hydrophobicity. A further aspect is the orientation of the bound proteins, that could be of crucial relevance for quantitative analysis, interaction studies, and enzymatic reactions. Many different surfaces, and chemical treatments of these surfaces, have been

[1]  H. Busscher,et al.  INTERFACIAL SELF-ASSEMBLY OF A SCHIZOPHYLLUM-COMMUNE HYDROPHOBIN INTO AN INSOLUBLE AMPHIPATHIC PROTEIN MEMBRANE DEPENDS ON SURFACE HYDROPHOBICITY , 1995 .

[2]  Jason Cleveland,et al.  Energy dissipation in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy , 1998 .

[3]  I. Rendina,et al.  Self-assembled biofilm of hydrophobins protects the silicon surface in the KOH wet etch process. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Ivo Rendina,et al.  Protein‐Modified Porous Silicon Nanostructures , 2008 .

[5]  M. Linder,et al.  Hydrophilic modification of polystyrene with hydrophobin for time-resolved immunofluorometric assay. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  Krueger,et al.  Cantilever dynamics in quasinoncontact force microscopy: Spectroscopic aspects. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[7]  G. Binnig,et al.  Tunneling through a controllable vacuum gap , 1982 .

[8]  Merja Penttilä,et al.  Interaction and comparison of a class I hydrophobin from Schizophyllum commune and class II hydrophobins from Trichoderma reesei. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[9]  G. Robillard,et al.  Self‐assembly of the hydrophobin SC3 proceeds via two structural intermediates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  D. Vollhardt,et al.  Thermodynamic and textural characterization of DPPG phospholipid monolayers. , 2000 .

[11]  E. Lacaze,et al.  Langmuir-Blodgett film of hydrophobin protein from Pleurotus ostreatus at the air-water interface. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  D. Vollhardt,et al.  Temperature dependence of the phase transition in branched chain phospholipid monolayers at the air/water interface , 2002 .

[13]  S. O. Lumsdon,et al.  Adsorption of hydrophobin proteins at hydrophobic and hydrophilic interfaces. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[14]  M. Shim,et al.  Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes for Biocompatibility and Biomolecular Recognition , 2002 .

[15]  Chen Wang,et al.  Two methods for glass surface modification and their application in protein immobilization. , 2007, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[16]  G. Jellison,et al.  Parameterization of the optical functions of amorphous materials in the interband region , 1996 .

[17]  G. Robillard,et al.  The SC3 hydrophobin self-assembles into a membrane with distinct mass transfer properties. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[18]  G. Szilvay,et al.  Behavior of Trichoderma reesei hydrophobins in solution: interactions, dynamics, and multimer formation. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[19]  S. Hou,et al.  Amperometric glucose biosensor based on multilayer films via layer-by-layer self-assembly of multi-wall carbon nanotubes, gold nanoparticles and glucose oxidase on the Pt electrode. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[20]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Deformation, Contact Time, and Phase Contrast in Tapping Mode Scanning Force Microscopy , 1996 .

[21]  Helge Lemmetyinen,et al.  Self-assembled films of hydrophobin proteins HFBI and HFBII studied in situ at the air/water interface. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy , 1999 .

[23]  Chen Wang,et al.  Bioactive surface modification of mica and poly(dimethylsiloxane) with hydrophobins for protein immobilization. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  G. Robillard,et al.  Structural changes and molecular interactions of hydrophobin SC3 in solution and on a hydrophobic surface , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  Andrea Crisanti,et al.  Antigen microarrays for serodiagnosis of infectious diseases. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[26]  X. Qin,et al.  Self-assembled film of hydrophobins on gold surfaces and its application to electrochemical biosensing. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[27]  Gerald Earle Jellison,et al.  Erratum: ‘‘Parameterization of the optical functions of amorphous materials in the interband region’’ [Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 371 (1996)] , 1996 .

[28]  Gerber,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope , 2020, Definitions.

[29]  Juhn H. Vig Handbook of Semiconductor Wafer Cleaning Technology i carbon dioxide , 2004 .

[30]  F. Zhao,et al.  Chemistry of carbon nanotubes in biomedical applications , 2010 .

[31]  Chen Wang,et al.  Surface modification using a novel type I hydrophobin HGFI , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[32]  D. Vollhardt,et al.  Equations of State for Langmuir Monolayers with Two-Dimensional Phase Transitions , 1999 .

[33]  Olli Ikkala,et al.  Aggregation and self-assembly of hydrophobins from Trichoderma reesei: low-resolution structural models. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[34]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  A comparison of the surface activity of the fungal hydrophobin SC3p with those of other proteins. , 1996, Biophysical chemistry.

[35]  Pascal Gallo,et al.  How does a tip tap? , 1997 .

[36]  Helge Lemmetyinen,et al.  Self-assembled films of hydrophobin protein HFBIII from Trichoderma reesei , 2007 .

[37]  Harald Fuchs,et al.  How to measure energy dissipation in dynamic mode atomic force microscopy , 1999 .