Seasonality of polar surface warming amplification in climate simulations

[1] The IPCC AR4 global warming climate simulations reveal a pronounced seasonality of polar warming amplification with maximum warming amplification in winter and minimum in summer. In this paper, we study the relative importance of surface albedo feedback (SAF), changes in cloud radiative forcing (CRF), changes in surface sensible and latent heat fluxes, changes in heat storage, and changes in the clear-sky downward infrared radiation in causing the strong seasonality of polar warming amplification by calculating partial temperature changes due to each of these processes using the surface energy budget equation. The main thermodynamic factor for a small polar warming amplification in summer is that the positive SAF is largely cancelled out by the negative surface CRF feedback in summer. The positive SAF is relatively much weaker in winter compared to its amplitude in summer, therefore does not contribute to the pronounced polar warming amplification in winter. The seasonal cycle of polar surface warming amplification, in terms of both spatial patterns and temporal amplitude, closely follows the seasonal cycle of the warming due to changes in clear-sky downward longwave radiation alone, indicating the importance of the atmospheric processes, such as water vapor feedback and dynamical feedbacks associated with the enhancement of poleward moist static energy transport, in causing the pronounced seasonality of polar warming amplification.

[1]  Cecilia M. Bitz,et al.  Dynamics of Recent Climate Change in the Arctic , 2002, Science.

[2]  Edgar L. Andreas,et al.  An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA : The surface heat budget of arctic ocen (SHEBA) , 2002 .

[3]  M. Winton,et al.  Amplified Arctic climate change: What does surface albedo feedback have to do with it? , 2006 .

[4]  Anthony J. Broccoli,et al.  On the Use of Cloud Forcing to Estimate Cloud Feedback , 2004 .

[5]  D. Rind The Doubled CO2 Climate: Impact of the Sea Surface Temperature Gradient , 1987 .

[6]  Q. Fu,et al.  Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds , 1993 .

[7]  Ming Cai,et al.  A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part II: Method demonstrations and comparisons , 2009 .

[8]  M. Cai,et al.  A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part I: formulation , 2009 .

[9]  M. Holland,et al.  Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models , 2003 .

[10]  M. Cai Dynamical amplification of polar warming , 2005 .

[11]  E. Källén,et al.  Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Q. Fu,et al.  Arctic warming aloft is data set dependent , 2008, Nature.

[13]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.

[14]  S. Vavrus The Impact of Cloud Feedbacks on Arctic Climate under Greenhouse Forcing , 2004 .

[15]  Ping Yang,et al.  Water‐vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008 , 2008 .

[16]  S. Vavrus An alternative method to calculate cloud radiative forcing: Implications for quantifying cloud feedbacks , 2006 .

[17]  Gerald L. Potter,et al.  A methodology for understanding and intercomparing atmospheric climate feedback processes in general circulation models , 1988 .