The impact of size and specialisation on universities’ department performance: A DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities

This paper explores the performance efficiency of natural and technical science departments at Austrian universities using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We present DEA as an alternative tool for benchmarking and ranking the assignment of decision-making units (organisations and organisational units). The method applies a multiple input and output variables approach, which is a clear advantage to other approaches using simple performance ratios. To deliver reasonable results, suitable input and output variables have been determined in a previous step using correlation analyses and OLS regression. The results validate the methods applied, and reveal performance differences and scale effects. The use of multiple output variables enables the revealing of detailed improvement or reduction amounts of each input and output of the evaluated units and furthermore for identifying the specialisation of teaching, research, and industrial cooperation. We find significant evidence that the size of a department influences its overall and specialisation performance; both small and large departments perform above average, which proves that simple linear scale effects do not exist.

[1]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Academic departments efficiency via DEA , 1994, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[3]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[4]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980's and early 1990's , 1998, Scientometrics.

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[7]  David Roessner,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative methods and measures in the evaluation of research , 2000 .

[8]  Karl-Heinz Leitner,et al.  Data envelopment analysis as method for evaluating intellectual capital , 2005 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  D. Teodorescu Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis , 2000 .

[11]  D. Dill,et al.  The regulation of public research universities: changes in academic competition and implications for university autonomy and accountability , 2001 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[13]  James P. Gander,et al.  Academic research and teaching productivities: A case study☆ , 1995 .

[14]  James S. Fairweather,et al.  The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity: Implications for Institutional Policy and Decision Making , 2002 .

[15]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[16]  Günter Fandel Zur Leistung nordrhein-westfälischer Universitäten – Gegenüberstellung einer Verteilungslösung und der Effizienzmaße einer Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[17]  C. Salerno,et al.  What we know about the efficiency of higher education institutions: the best evidence , 2003 .

[18]  J. Beasley Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies , 1995 .

[19]  Philip Stevens The Determinants of Economic Efficiency in English and Welsh Universities , 2001 .

[20]  Agha Iqbal Ali,et al.  Computational Aspects of DEA , 1994 .