In vivo and in silico analysis of PCNA ubiquitylation in the activation of the Post Replication Repair pathway in S. cerevisiae

BackgroundThe genome of living organisms is constantly exposed to several damaging agents that induce different types of DNA lesions, leading to cellular malfunctioning and onset of many diseases. To maintain genome stability, cells developed various repair and tolerance systems to counteract the effects of DNA damage. Here we focus on Post Replication Repair (PRR), the pathway involved in the bypass of DNA lesions induced by sunlight exposure and UV radiation. PRR acts through two different mechanisms, activated by mono- and poly-ubiquitylation of the DNA sliding clamp, called Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA).ResultsWe developed a novel protocol to measure the time-course ratios between mono-, di- and tri-ubiquitylated PCNA isoforms on a single western blot, which were used as the wet readout for PRR events in wild type and mutant S. cerevisiae cells exposed to acute UV radiation doses. Stochastic simulations of PCNA ubiquitylation dynamics, performed by exploiting a novel mechanistic model of PRR, well fitted the experimental data at low UV doses, but evidenced divergent behaviors at high UV doses, thus driving the design of further experiments to verify new hypothesis on the functioning of PRR. The model predicted the existence of a UV dose threshold for the proper functioning of the PRR model, and highlighted an overlapping effect of Nucleotide Excision Repair (the pathway effectively responsible to clean the genome from UV lesions) on the dynamics of PCNA ubiquitylation in different phases of the cell cycle. In addition, we showed that ubiquitin concentration can affect the rate of PCNA ubiquitylation in PRR, offering a possible explanation to the DNA damage sensitivity of yeast strains lacking deubiquitylating enzymes.ConclusionsWe exploited an in vivo and in silico combinational approach to analyze for the first time in a Systems Biology context the events of PCNA ubiquitylation occurring in PRR in budding yeast cells. Our findings highlighted an intricate functional crosstalk between PRR and other events controlling genome stability, and evidenced that PRR is more complicated and still far less characterized than previously thought.

[1]  P. Cohen,et al.  Chaperoned ubiquitylation--crystal structures of the CHIP U box E3 ubiquitin ligase and a CHIP-Ubc13-Uev1a complex. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[2]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  BioSimWare: A Software for the Modeling, Simulation and Analysis of Biological Systems , 2010, Int. Conf. on Membrane Computing.

[3]  C. Pickart,et al.  Molecular Insights into Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly Crystal Structure of the Mms2/Ubc13 Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[4]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1‐ and Rad53‐dependent checkpoint in budding yeast , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[5]  D. Karentz,et al.  The Induction and Repair of DNA Photodamage in the Environment , 1993 .

[6]  M. Resnick,et al.  Repair of Pyrimidine Dimer Damage Induced in Yeast by Ultraviolet Light , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  Fritz F. Parl,et al.  A Mathematical Model for DNA Damage and Repair , 2010, Journal of nucleic acids.

[8]  C. Pickart,et al.  Noncanonical MMS2-Encoded Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Functions in Assembly of Novel Polyubiquitin Chains for DNA Repair , 1999, Cell.

[9]  H. Walden,et al.  Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  Masahiro Okamoto,et al.  Mathematical modeling of cell cycle regulation in response to DNA damage: Exploring mechanisms of cell-fate determination , 2011, Biosyst..

[11]  Masahiro Okamoto,et al.  Mathematical modeling and sensitivity analysis of G1/S phase in the cell cycle including the DNA-damage signal transduction pathway , 2008, Biosyst..

[12]  R. Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical modeling of nucleotide excision repair reveals efficiency of sequential assembly strategies. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[13]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  John R. Yates,et al.  Proteomics: Where's Waldo in yeast? , 2003, Nature.

[15]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  J. Holton,et al.  Structural basis for recruitment of Ubc12 by an E2 binding domain in NEDD8's E1. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[17]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Requirement of Nse1, a Subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 Complex, for Rad52-Dependent Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Thymine-Thymine Dimer Bypass by Yeast DNA Polymerase ζ , 1996, Science.

[19]  Edith D. Wong,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Danielle L. Watt,et al.  RNase H and Postreplication Repair Protect Cells from Ribonucleotides Incorporated in DNA , 2012, Molecular cell.

[21]  J. Bujnicki,et al.  Databases and Bioinformatics Tools for the Study of DNA Repair , 2011, Molecular biology international.

[22]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  A. Haas,et al.  The mechanism of ubiquitin activating enzyme. A kinetic and equilibrium analysis. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Functional characterization of Rad18 domains for Rad6, ubiquitin, DNA binding and PCNA modification , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  E. Friedberg,et al.  Erratum: Trading places: How do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? (Molecular Cell (May 27, 2005) 18 (499-505) PII: S1097-2765(05)01276-1 and DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.032) , 2005 .

[26]  Ping Wang,et al.  Structure of a c-Cbl–UbcH7 Complex RING Domain Function in Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases , 2000, Cell.

[27]  C. Ball,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[28]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  A Mathematical Model for the Detection Mechanism of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Depending on Autophosphorylation of ATM , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  E2 conjugating enzymes must disengage from their E1 enzymes before E3-dependent ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like transfer , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  D. Häder,et al.  UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review , 2002, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[31]  W. Xiao,et al.  Roles of sequential ubiquitination of PCNA in DNA‐damage tolerance , 2011, FEBS letters.

[32]  H. Ulrich,et al.  Architecture and assembly of poly-SUMO chains on PCNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  David M. Wilson,et al.  A quantitative model of human DNA base excision repair. I. Mechanistic insights. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  Tobias von der Haar,et al.  A quantitative estimation of the global translational activity in logarithmically growing yeast cells , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[35]  J. Weiss,et al.  Dynamics of the cell cycle: checkpoints, sizers, and timers. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[36]  A. Aboussekhra,et al.  Homologous recombination is involved in transcription‐coupled repair of UV damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[37]  David Reverter,et al.  Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO–RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex , 2005, Nature.

[38]  A. Davies,et al.  SUMO modification of PCNA is controlled by DNA , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[39]  C. Pickart,et al.  Synthesis of Free and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen-bound Polyubiquitin Chains by the RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Rad5* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  S. Jinks-Robertson,et al.  The in Vivo Characterization of Translesion Synthesis Across UV-Induced Lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Insights Into Polζ- and Polη-Dependent Frameshift Mutagenesis , 2006, Genetics.

[41]  A. Amerik,et al.  The Doa4 deubiquitinating enzyme is required for ubiquitin homeostasis in yeast. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[42]  R. M. Holmes.  Deubiquitinating enzymes and post-replication repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 2010 .

[43]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[44]  Ivan Dikic,et al.  The spatial and temporal organization of ubiquitin networks , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  A. Carr,et al.  RAD6–RAD18–RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light , 2009, Nature.

[46]  P. Howley,et al.  Structure of an E6AP-UbcH7 complex: insights into ubiquitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade. , 1999, Science.

[47]  H. Ulrich,et al.  Distinct consequences of posttranslational modification by linear versus K63-linked polyubiquitin chains , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[49]  A. Davies,et al.  Activation of Ubiquitin-Dependent DNA Damage Bypass Is Mediated by Replication Protein A , 2008, Molecular cell.

[50]  H. Ulrich,et al.  Protein-Protein Interactions within an E2-RING Finger Complex , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  A. Davies,et al.  Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication , 2010, Nature.

[52]  P. Plevani,et al.  Checkpoint mechanisms at the intersection between DNA damage and repair. , 2009, DNA repair.

[53]  H. Ahmed.  Principles And Reactions Of Protein Extraction, Purification, And Characterization , 2004 .

[54]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[55]  T. Sixma,et al.  E3 ligase Rad18 promotes monoubiquitination rather than ubiquitin chain formation by E2 enzyme Rad6 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  J. Parker,et al.  Mechanistic analysis of PCNA poly-ubiquitylation by the ubiquitin protein ligases Rad18 and Rad5 , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[57]  Mike Tyers,et al.  The size of the nucleus increases as yeast cells grow. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[58]  W. V. van Cappellen,et al.  Nuclear Dynamics of PCNA in DNA Replication and Repair , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[59]  P. Sung,et al.  Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. , 1994, Genes & development.

[60]  W. Siede,et al.  Influence Of Deubiquitinating Enzymes On Mutagenesis In Saccharomyces Cerevisiae , 2010 .

[61]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork , 2007, Cell.

[62]  A. Amerik,et al.  Analysis of the Deubiquitinating Enzymes of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Biological chemistry.

[63]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair , 2009, Nature.

[64]  A. Bielinsky,et al.  Defects in DNA Ligase I Trigger PCNA Ubiquitination at Lysine 107 , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[65]  Hermann Schindelin,et al.  Structural Insights into E1-Catalyzed Ubiquitin Activation and Transfer to Conjugating Enzymes , 2008, Cell.

[66]  T. Elston,et al.  A mathematical model for human nucleotide excision repair: damage recognition by random order assembly and kinetic proofreading. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[67]  P. Plevani,et al.  Mind the gap: Keeping UV lesions in check , 2011, DNA repair.

[68]  Peter J McKinnon,et al.  Linking DNA damage and neurodegeneration , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[69]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[70]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Choreography of the DNA Damage Response Spatiotemporal Relationships among Checkpoint and Repair Proteins , 2004, Cell.

[71]  L. Prakash,et al.  Three additional genes involved in pyrimidine dimer removal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: RAD7, RAD14 and MMS19 , 1979, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[72]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[73]  C. Grebogi,et al.  A matter of life or death: modeling DNA damage and repair in bacteria. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[74]  M. Brendel,et al.  UV-Induction of Thymine-Containing Dimers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[75]  J. Hoeijmakers.  Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.

[76]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[77]  A. Davies,et al.  In vivo detection and characterization of sumoylation targets in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[78]  C. Hill,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzyme Rad6 at 2.6 Å Resolution* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[79]  Floyd E. Romesberg,et al.  Role of Doa1 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Damage Response , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[80]  Satya Prakash,et al.  Domains required for dimerization of yeast Rad6 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and Rad18 DNA binding protein , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[81]  D. Finley,et al.  Ubiquitin Depletion as a Key Mediator of Toxicity by Translational Inhibitors , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[82]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme , 1987, Nature.

[83]  E. Friedberg,et al.  DNA Repair and Mutagenesis , 2006 .

[84]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[85]  C. Pickart,et al.  In Vitro Assembly and Recognition of Lys-63 Polyubiquitin Chains* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[86]  L. Prakash,et al.  Requirement of Replication Checkpoint Protein Kinases Mec1/Rad53 for Postreplication Repair in Yeast , 2011, mBio.

[87]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Mms2–Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[88]  Mark Bennett,et al.  A novel method for the genome-wide high resolution analysis of DNA damage , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[89]  E. Friedberg,et al.  Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? , 2005, Molecular cell.

[90]  P. Plevani,et al.  Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[91]  M. J. Moné,et al.  Stochastic and reversible assembly of a multiprotein DNA repair complex ensures accurate target site recognition and efficient repair , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[92]  Attila Csikász-Nagy,et al.  Computational systems biology of the cell cycle , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[93]  A. Bueno,et al.  Reversal of PCNA Ubiquitylation by Ubp10 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[94]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[95]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Role of DNA Polymerase η in the Bypass of a (6-4) TT Photoproduct , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[96]  J. Bader,et al.  A DNA Integrity Network in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Cell.

[97]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes in DNA repair , 2000, The EMBO journal.