Upstream heterogeneous zones: small stream systems structured by a lack of competence?

Abstract Small headwater streams have a suite of physical eccentricities that distinguishes them from the rest of the river system. These differences are now recognized in the study of sediment transport and channel morphology, but their implications for other limnological disciplines are less apparent. We suggest a zonation scheme for the upper stream system that acknowledges obvious geomorphic boundaries while highlighting differences in fine-scale habitat features that are likely to be biologically relevant. The upstream heterogeneous zone (UHZ) is distinguished by a high ratio of structural component size to stream width. Structural components include large rocks exposed from the regolith or from colluvial sources, tree roots, and woody debris, all of which are stochastically distributed and can constrain the morphology, hydraulics, and habitat distribution of small headwater streams. The high ratio of structural component size to stream width is a geomorphic phenomenon linked to the stream's lack of competence to move the material that forms its bed and banks. It follows that the incompetence of streams within the UHZ is ultimately responsible for their greater internal physical heterogeneity than downstream reaches and is a fundamental driver of their physical structure, dynamics, and possibly ecology. Benign hydraulic conditions in small headwater streams have the potential to uncouple the link between physical and biological heterogeneity, resulting in a faunal community composed of highly mobile generalists.

[1]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Distribution of bedrock and alluvial channels in forested mountain drainage basins , 1996, Nature.

[2]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks? , 1998 .

[3]  B. Downes,et al.  Spatial Variation in the Force Required to Initiate Rock Movement in 4 Upland Streams: Implications for Estimating Disturbance Frequencies , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  M. Palmer,et al.  Streambed landscapes: evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  G. Englund.  Effects of Disturbance on Stream Moss and Invertebrate Community Structure , 1991, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  B. Statzner,et al.  Questions and Comments on the River Continuum Concept , 1985 .

[7]  A. Suren.  Bryophytes as invertebrate habitat in two New Zealand alpine streams , 1991 .

[8]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Downstream coarsening in headwater channels , 2002 .

[10]  F. Triska.  Role of wood debris in modifying channel geomorphology and riparian areas of a large lowland river under pristine conditions: A historical case study: With 7 figures and 4 tables in the text , 1984 .

[11]  A. Hildrew,et al.  All creatures great and small: patterns in the stream benthos across a wide range of metazoan body size , 2003 .

[12]  J. Stanford,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Alluvial Rivers: Connectivity and the Hyporheic Corridor , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[14]  R. F. Ewan.  LANDSCAPE AND MEMORY , 1996, Landscape Journal.

[15]  K. Dwire.  Controls on Patterns of Coarse Organic Particle Retention in Headwater Streams , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  A. Boulton,et al.  The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia.: III. Temporal changes in faunal composition , 1992 .

[17]  J. J. Vries,et al.  Seasonal expansion and contraction of stream networks in shallow groundwater systems , 1995 .

[18]  M. Palmer,et al.  What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities? , 2000 .

[19]  D. Strayer.  Perspectives on the Size Structure of Lacustrine Zoobenthos, Its Causes, and Its Consequences , 1991, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[20]  Peter C. Patton,et al.  Gully Erosion, Northwestern Colorado: A Threshold Phenomenon , 1975 .

[21]  P. Carling.  The nature of the fluid boundary layer and the selection of parameters for benthic ecology , 1992 .

[22]  A. Benke,et al.  Importance of Snag Habitat for Animal Production in Southeastern Streams , 1985 .

[23]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  Transport and Retention of Particulate Organic Matter in Two Low-Gradient Headwater Streams , 1991, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[24]  A. Morin,et al.  Relationships between Size Structure of Invertebrate Assemblages and Trophy and Substrate Composition in Streams , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  M. Kirkby.  Hill slopes and hollows , 1988, Nature.

[26]  S. Rice.  Which tributaries disrupt downstream fining along gravel-bed rivers? , 1998 .

[27]  J. Gore,et al.  Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  Benthic meiofauna responses to five forest harvest methods , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[29]  P. Davies,et al.  Changes in stream biota along a gradient of logging disturbance, 15 years after logging at Ben Nevis, Tasmania , 2005 .

[30]  T. Gomi,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF WOOD IN HEADWATER STREAMS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST 1 , 2005 .

[31]  Robert C. Petersen,et al.  Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1985 .

[32]  Leon A. Barmuta,et al.  An ecologically useful classification of mean and near‐bed flows in streams and rivers , 1989 .

[33]  J. Rodda,et al.  A stream length study , 1973 .

[34]  A. N. Strahler.  Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. , 1952 .

[35]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Size structure of the metazoan community in a Piedmont stream , 1993, Oecologia.

[36]  Jenny Davis,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Near-Bed Flows and Macroinvertebrate Communities in a Western Australian Stream , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[37]  A. Morin,et al.  Size Distribution of Epilithic Lotic Invertebrates and Implications for Community Metabolism , 1991, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[38]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  Meiofauna in intermittent streams differ among watersheds subjected to five methods of timber harvest , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[39]  A. Boulton,et al.  Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the river murray, Australia , 1992 .

[40]  L. Barmuta.  Interaction Between the Effects of Substratum, Velocity and Location on Stream Benthos: an Experiment , 1990 .

[41]  G. Likens,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIC DEBRIS DAMS IN THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF STREAM ECOSYSTEMS , 1980 .

[42]  J. T. Hack,et al.  Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians , 1960 .

[43]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[44]  A. Suren.  Bryophytes and associated invertebrates in first-order alpine streams of Arthur's Pass, New Zealand , 1993 .

[45]  P. Davies,et al.  Changes to headwater stream morphology, habitats and riparian vegetation recorded 15 years after pre-Forest Practices Code forest clearfelling in upland granite terrain, Tasmania, Australia , 2005 .

[46]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  Flood Disturbance in a Forested Mountain Landscape Interactions of land use and floods , 1998 .

[47]  V. Uvíra,et al.  Moss- and mineral substrata-dwelling meiobenthos in two different low-order streams , 2002 .

[48]  T. Angradi,et al.  Vertical, Longitudinal and Temporal Variation in the Macrobenthos of an Appalachian Headwater Stream System , 2001 .

[49]  C. Jackson,et al.  Woody debris and channel morphology in first‐ and second‐order forested channels in Washington's coast ranges , 2002 .

[50]  B. Statzner,et al.  Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns , 1986 .

[51]  E. W. Lane.  The Importance of Fluvial Morphology in Hydraulic Engineering , 1955 .

[52]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates in small intermittent streams to silvicultural practices , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[53]  David C. Schneider,et al.  Quantitative Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Scaling , 1994 .

[54]  M. Church,et al.  Benthic assemblage variation among channel units in high-gradient streams on Vancouver Island, British Columbia , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[55]  F. Swanson,et al.  Large wood and fluvial processes , 2002 .

[56]  D. C. Erman,et al.  The response of stream macroinvertebrates to substrate size and heterogeneity , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[57]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Where do channels begin? , 1988, Nature.

[58]  E. Wohl,et al.  Toward a theory for step pools in stream channels , 2005 .

[59]  K. Richards.  The morphology of riffle‐pool sequences , 1976 .

[60]  M. Church.  Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[61]  Seth R. Reice,et al.  The Role of Substratum in Benthic Macroinvertebrate Microdistribution and Litter Decomposition in a Woodland Stream , 1980 .

[62]  D. Williams.  Some relationships between stream benthos and substrate heterogeneity , 1980 .

[63]  Michael Church,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGY OF STEEPLAND HEADWATERS: THE TRANSITION FROM HILLSLOPES TO CHANNELS 1 , 2005 .

[64]  P. S. Lake,et al.  The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. II. Comparisons of faunal composition between habitats, rivers and years , 1992 .

[65]  R. Virtanen,et al.  The stream as a habitat templet for bryophytes: species' distributions along gradients in disturbance and substratum heterogeneity , 1995 .

[66]  J. T. Hack.  Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland , 1957 .

[67]  S. Schumm.  EVOLUTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SLOPES IN BADLANDS AT PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY , 1956 .

[68]  T. Angradi,et al.  Inter-Habitat Variation in Benthic Community Structure, Function, and Organic Matter Storage in 3 Appalachian Headwater Streams , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[69]  M. Wolman,et al.  Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes , 1960, The Journal of Geology.

[70]  M. Palmer,et al.  The arrangement of resources in patchy landscapes: effects on distribution, survival, and resource acquisition of chironomids , 2000, Oecologia.

[71]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  The influence of periphyton, detritus and shelter on invertebrate colonization of aquatic bryophytes , 1992 .

[72]  J. Nikuradse.  Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes , 1950 .

[73]  R. Sidle,et al.  Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems , 2002 .

[74]  J. Nikuradse.  Stromungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren , 1933 .

[75]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Pool Spacing in Forest Channels , 1995 .

[76]  G. Poole.  Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum , 2002 .

[77]  E. Colhoun.  Periglacial landforms and deposits of Tasmania , 2002 .

[78]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Lost linkages and lotic ecology: rediscovering small streams. , 2001 .

[79]  J. Spotila,et al.  The form and function of headwater streams based on field and modeling investigations in the southern Appalachian Mountains , 2005 .

[80]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[81]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[82]  D. Montgomery.  PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1 , 1999 .

[83]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  Sediment transport and channel morphology of small, forested streams , 2005 .

[84]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[85]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[86]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Methodological and conceptual issues in the search for a relationship between animal body-size distributions and benthic habitat architecture , 2005 .

[87]  R. Horton.  Drainage‐basin characteristics , 1932 .

[88]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature , 2003 .

[89]  F. Hauer,et al.  Flow competence and streambed stability: an evaluation of technique and application , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.