Evolution and phylogenetic utility of alignment gaps within intron sequences of three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus).

To test whether gaps resulting from sequence alignment contain phylogenetic signal concordant with those of base substitutions, we analyzed the occurrence of indel mutations upon a well-resolved, substitution-based tree for three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus, Apidae: Bombini). The regions analyzed were exon and intron sequences of long-wavelength rhodopsin (LW Rh), arginine kinase (ArgK), and elongation factor-1alpha (EF-1alpha) F2 copy genes. LW Rh intron had only a few uninformative gaps, ArgK intron had relatively long gaps that were easily aligned, and EF-1alpha intron had many short gaps, resulting in multiple optimal alignments. The unambiguously aligned gaps within ArgK intron sequences showed no homoplasy upon the substitution-based tree, and phylogenetic signals within ambiguously aligned regions of EF-1alpha intron were highly congruent with those of base substitutions. We further analyzed the contribution of gap characters to phylogenetic reconstruction by incorporating them in parsimony analysis. Inclusion of gap characters consistently improved support for nodes recovered by substitutions, and inclusion of ambiguously aligned regions of EF-1alpha intron resolved several additional nodes, most of which were apical on the phylogeny. We conclude that gaps are an exceptionally reliable source of phylogenetic information that can be used to corroborate and refine phylogenies hypothesized by base substitutions, at least at lower taxonomic levels. At present, full use of gaps in phylogenetic reconstruction is best achieved in parsimony analysis, pending development of well-justified and generally applicable methods for incorporating indels in explicitly model-based methods.

[1]  Fixed Character States and the Optimization of Molecular Sequence Data , 1999 .

[2]  Hervé Philippe,et al.  The potential value of indels as phylogenetic markers: position of trichomonads as a case study. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  P. Wagner,et al.  Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[4]  W. Wheeler,et al.  The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: Ecdysozoa, islands, trees, and the "Parsimony ratchet". , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[5]  P. Mardulyn,et al.  The major opsin in bees (Insecta: Hymenoptera): A promising nuclear gene for higher level phylogenetics. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[6]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Microstructural Changes in Noncoding Chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, Evolution, and Utility of Indels and Inversions in Basal Angiosperm Phylogenetic Inference , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[7]  J. Farris Likelihood and Inconsistency , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[8]  N. Saitou,et al.  Evolutionary rates of insertion and deletion in noncoding nucleotide sequences of primates. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[10]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Multi‐residue gaps, a class of molecular characters with exceptional reliability for phylogenetic analyses , 1991 .

[11]  Mark P. Simmons,et al.  Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[12]  R. Belshaw,et al.  The phylogenetic analysis of variable-length sequence data: elongation factor-1alpha introns in European populations of the parasitoid wasp genus Pauesia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae). , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  W. Wheeler OPTIMIZATION ALIGNMENT: THE END OF MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT IN PHYLOGENETICS? , 1996 .

[14]  P. Holland,et al.  Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  B. Danforth Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M J Sanderson,et al.  Parametric phylogenetics? , 2000, Systematic biology.

[17]  K. Bremer,et al.  BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY , 1994 .

[18]  Roeland C. H. J. van Ham,et al.  Molecular evolution of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome in the Crassulaceae and related species , 1994, Current Genetics.

[19]  J. Thompson,et al.  Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  C. Bult,et al.  TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .

[21]  H. Philippe,et al.  How good are deep phylogenetic trees? , 1998, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[22]  Mark P. Simmons,et al.  Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[23]  P. Williams An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an analysis of patterns of description (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini) , 1998 .

[24]  Van,et al.  The Virtues of Gaps : Xenarthran ( Edentate ) Monophyly Supported by a Unique Deletion in a A-Crystallin , 2001 .

[25]  E. Paradis,et al.  The virtues of gaps: xenarthran (Edentate) monophyly supported by a unique deletion in alpha A-crystallin. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[26]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .