A new probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for greater Tokyo

Tokyo and its outlying cities are home to one-quarter of Japan's 127 million people. Highly destructive earthquakes struck the capital in 1703, 1855 and 1923, the last of which took 105 000 lives. Fuelled by greater Tokyo's rich seismological record, but challenged by its magnificent complexity, our joint Japanese–US group carried out a new study of the capital's earthquake hazards. We used the prehistoric record of great earthquakes preserved by uplifted marine terraces and tsunami deposits (17 M∼8 shocks in the past 7000 years), a newly digitized dataset of historical shaking (10 000 observations in the past 400 years), the dense modern seismic network (300 000 earthquakes in the past 30 years), and Japan's GeoNet array (150 GPS vectors in the past 10 years) to reinterpret the tectonic structure, identify active faults and their slip rates and estimate their earthquake frequency. We propose that a dislodged fragment of the Pacific plate is jammed between the Pacific, Philippine Sea and Eurasian plates beneath the Kanto plain on which Tokyo sits. We suggest that the Kanto fragment controls much of Tokyo's seismic behaviour for large earthquakes, including the damaging 1855 M∼7.3 Ansei-Edo shock. On the basis of the frequency of earthquakes beneath greater Tokyo, events with magnitude and location similar to the M∼7.3 Ansei-Edo event have a ca 20% likelihood in an average 30 year period. In contrast, our renewal (time-dependent) probability for the great M≥7.9 plate boundary shocks such as struck in 1923 and 1703 is 0.5% for the next 30 years, with a time-averaged 30 year probability of ca 10%. The resulting net likelihood for severe shaking (ca 0.9g peak ground acceleration (PGA)) in Tokyo, Kawasaki and Yokohama for the next 30 years is ca 30%. The long historical record in Kanto also affords a rare opportunity to calculate the probability of shaking in an alternative manner exclusively from intensity observations. This approach permits robust estimates for the spatial distribution of expected shaking, even for sites with few observations. The resulting probability of severe shaking is ca 35% in Tokyo, Kawasaki and Yokohama and ca 10% in Chiba for an average 30 year period, in good agreement with our independent estimate, and thus bolstering our view that Tokyo's hazard looms large. Given $1 trillion estimates for the cost of an M∼7.3 shock beneath Tokyo, our probability implies a $13 billion annual probable loss.

[1]  R. Stein,et al.  A new 1649-1884 catalog of destructive earthquakes near Tokyo and implications for the long-term seismic process , 2006 .

[2]  Kazumitsu Yoshikawa,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Aftershocks of the 1923 Kanto Earthquake , 2001 .

[3]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  Estimating earthquake location and magnitude from seismic intensity data , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Tom Parsons,et al.  Significance of stress transfer in time‐dependent earthquake probability calculations , 2004 .

[5]  Glenn P. Biasi,et al.  Past and Future Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault , 2005, Science.

[6]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Inference of postseismic deformation mechanisms of the 1923 Kanto earthquake , 2006 .

[7]  A. Levander,et al.  Mapping the subducting Pacific slab beneath southwest Japan with Hi-net receiver functions , 2005 .

[8]  T. Sagiya Interplate Coupling in the Kanto District, Central Japan, and the Boso Peninsula Silent Earthquake in May 1996 , 2004 .

[9]  Serkan B. Bozkurt,et al.  Forecasting Probabilistic Seismic Shaking for Greater Tokyo from 400 Years of Intensity Observations , 2007 .

[10]  M. Ishida THE SEISMICALLY QUIESCENT BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE PHILIPPINE SEA PLATE AND THE EURASIAN PLATE IN CENTRAL JAPAN , 1995 .

[11]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Correlation of JMA instrumental seismic intensity with strong motion parameters , 2002 .

[12]  F. Pollitz,et al.  The 1923 Kanto earthquake reevaluated using a newly augmented geodetic data set , 2006 .

[13]  The Stress Triggering Role of the 1923 Kanto Earthquake. , 2005 .

[14]  O. Fujiwara,et al.  Significance of Sedimentological Time-averaging for Estimation of Depositional Age by 14C Dating on Molluscan Shells , 2003 .

[15]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  F. Masuda,et al.  Holocene Tsunami Deposits Detected by Drilling in Drowned Valleys of the Boso and Miura Peninsulas , 1999 .

[17]  M. Ishida Geometry and relative motion of the Philippine Sea plate and Pacific plate beneath the Kanto-Tokai district, Japan , 1992 .

[18]  Hiroshi P. Sato,et al.  Earthquake Source Fault Beneath Tokyo , 2005, Science.

[19]  T. Sagiya,et al.  Crustal block kinematics and seismic potential of the northernmost Philippine Sea plate and Izu microplate, central Japan, inferred from GPS and leveling data , 2007 .

[20]  T. Nakata,et al.  HOLOCENE MARINE TERRACES AND SEISMIC CRUSTAL MOVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF BOSO PENINSULA, KANTO, JAPAN , 1980 .

[21]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Time-dependent earthquake probabilities , 2005 .

[22]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  Two‐way coupling between Vesuvius eruptions and southern Apennine earthquakes, Italy, by elastic stress transfer , 1998 .

[23]  Glenn P. Biasi,et al.  Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: What a long recurrence record tells us about how faults work , 2004 .

[24]  Magnitude and location of historical earthquakes in Japan and implications for the 1855 Ansei Edo earthquake , 2005 .

[25]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  A Brownian Model for Recurrent Earthquakes , 2002 .

[26]  C. Newhall,et al.  Fire and mud: eruptions and lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines , 1998 .

[27]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the 1923 Kanto earthquake, Japan , 2005 .