Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback

An experimental study of interaction in a collaborative desktop virtual environment is described. The aim of the experiment was to investigate if added haptic force feedback in such an environment affects perceived virtual presence, perceived social presence, perceived task performance, and task performance. A between-group design was employed, where seven pairs of subjects used an interface with graphic representation of the environment, audio connection, and haptic force feedback. Seven other pairs of subjects used an interface without haptic force feedback, but with identical features otherwise. The PHANToM, a one-point haptic device, was used for the haptic force feedback, and a program especially developed for the purpose provided the virtual environment. The program enables for two individuals placed in different locations to simultaneously feel and manipulate dynamic objects in a shared desktop virtual environment. Results show that haptic force feedback significantly improves task performance, perceived task performance, and pereceived virtual presence in the collaborative distributed environment. The results suggest that haptic force feedback increases perceived social presence, but the difference is not significant.

[1]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  The role of Haptic communication in shared virtual environments , 1998 .

[2]  Kirsten Rassmus-Gröhn,et al.  The sense of touch provides new computer interaction techniques for disabled people , 1999 .

[3]  Poppy Lauretta Mcleod,et al.  New Communication Technologies for Group Decision Making: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1996 .

[4]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[5]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality , 1996 .

[6]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Effect of a Pneumatically Driven Haptic Interface on the Perceptional Capabilities of Human Operators , 1998, Presence.

[7]  Rakesh Gupta,et al.  Experiments Using Multimodal Virtual Environments in Design for Assembly Analysis , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Thomas Harold Massie,et al.  Initial haptic explorations with the phantom : virtual touch through point interaction , 1996 .

[10]  Makoto Sato,et al.  Networked SPIDAR:A Networked Virtual Environment with Visual, Auditory, and Haptic Interactions , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[13]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Telepresence , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Mel Slater,et al.  Presence in Shared Virtual Environments and Virtual Togetherness , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.