A five-field augmented fully-mixed finite element method for the Navier-Stokes/Darcy coupled problem

Abstract In this work we introduce and analyze a new augmented fully-mixed formulation for the stationary Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupled problem. Our approach employs, on the free-fluid region, a technique previously applied to the stationary Navier–Stokes equations, which consists of the introduction of a modified pseudostress tensor involving the diffusive and convective terms, together with the pressure. In addition, by using the incompressibility condition, the pressure is eliminated, and since the convective term forces the free-fluid velocity to live in a smaller space than usual, we augment the resulting formulation with suitable Galerkin type terms arising from the constitutive and equilibrium equations. On the other hand, in the Darcy region we apply the usual dual-mixed formulation, which yields the introduction of the trace of the porous media pressure as an associated Lagrange multiplier. The latter is connected with the fact that one of the transmission conditions involving mass conservation becomes essential and must be imposed weakly. In this way, we obtain a five-field formulation where the pseudostress and the velocity in the fluid, together with the velocity and the pressure in the porous medium, and the aforementioned Lagrange multiplier, are the corresponding unknowns. The well-posedness analysis is carried out by combining the classical Babuska–Brezzi theory and the Banach fixed-point theorem. A proper adaptation of the arguments exploited in the continuous analysis allows us to state suitable hypotheses on the finite element subspaces ensuring that the associated Galerkin scheme is well-posed and convergent. In particular, Raviart–Thomas elements of lowest order for the pseudostress and the Darcy velocity, continuous piecewise linear polynomials for the free-fluid velocity, piecewise constants for the Darcy pressure, together with continuous piecewise linear elements for the Lagrange multiplier, constitute feasible choices. Finally, we provide several numerical results illustrating the performance of the Galerkin method and confirming the theoretical rates of convergence.

[1]  Ricardo Ruiz-Baier,et al.  New fully-mixed finite element methods for the Stokes–Darcy coupling☆ , 2015 .

[2]  Gabriel N. Gatica,et al.  An Augmented Mixed Finite Element Method for the Navier-Stokes Equations with Variable Viscosity , 2016, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[3]  Francisco-Javier Sayas,et al.  Analysis of fully-mixed finite element methods for the Stokes-Darcy coupled problem , 2011, Math. Comput..

[4]  Salim Meddahi,et al.  A Coupled Mixed Finite Element Method for the Interaction Problem between an Electromagnetic Field and an Elastic Body , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[5]  B. Rivière,et al.  On the solution of the coupled Navier–Stokes and Darcy equations , 2009 .

[6]  Jinchao Xu,et al.  Numerical Solution to a Mixed Navier-Stokes/Darcy Model by the Two-Grid Approach , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[7]  Arif Masud A stabilized mixed finite element method for Darcy–Stokes flow , 2007 .

[8]  Ricardo Ruiz-Baier,et al.  An augmented stress‐based mixed finite element method for the steady state Navier‐Stokes equations with nonlinear viscosity , 2017 .

[9]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[10]  G. Gatica,et al.  A conforming mixed finite-element method for the coupling of fluid flow with porous media flow , 2008 .

[11]  Sergio Caucao,et al.  A fully-mixed finite element method for the Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupled problem with nonlinear viscosity , 2017, J. Num. Math..

[12]  Gabriel N. Gatica,et al.  Analysis of the HDG method for the stokes–darcy coupling , 2017 .

[13]  Frédéric Hecht,et al.  New development in freefem++ , 2012, J. Num. Math..

[14]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Navier-Stokes/Darcy Coupling: Modeling, Analysis, and Numerical Approximation , 2009 .

[15]  Willi Jäger,et al.  On The Interface Boundary Condition of Beavers, Joseph, and Saffman , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[16]  Ricardo Ruiz-Baier,et al.  Error analysis of an augmented mixed method for the Navier–Stokes problem with mixed boundary conditions , 2018 .

[17]  G. Gatica,et al.  Analysis of an augmented fully-mixed approach for the coupling of quasi-Newtonian fluids and porous media , 2014 .

[18]  E. Miglio,et al.  Mathematical and numerical models for coupling surface and groundwater flows , 2002 .

[19]  Ricardo Oyarzúa,et al.  A conforming mixed finite element method for the Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupled problem , 2016, Numerische Mathematik.

[20]  VIVETTE GIRAULT,et al.  DG Approximation of Coupled Navier-Stokes and Darcy Equations by Beaver-Joseph-Saffman Interface Condition , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[21]  S. Meddahi,et al.  Strong coupling of finite element methods for the Stokes–Darcy problem , 2012, 1203.4717.

[22]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  Algorithm 832: UMFPACK V4.3---an unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method , 2004, TOMS.

[23]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Numerical analysis of the Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupling , 2010, Numerische Mathematik.

[24]  J. Galvis,et al.  NON-MATCHING MORTAR DISCRETIZATION ANALYSIS FOR THE COUPLING STOKES-DARCY EQUATIONS , 2007 .

[25]  Francisco-Javier Sayas,et al.  A twofold saddle point approach for the coupling of fluid flow with nonlinear porous media flow , 2012 .

[27]  Yanren Hou,et al.  Numerical analysis for the mixed Navier–Stokes and Darcy Problem with the Beavers–Joseph interface condition , 2015 .

[28]  R. Hiptmair Finite elements in computational electromagnetism , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[29]  D. Joseph,et al.  Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.