Evaluation of spatial audio reproduction methods (part 2) : analysis of listener preference

A paired-comparison preference rating experiment was performed in combination with a free-elicitation task for eight reproduction methods (consumer and professional systems with a wide range of expected quality) and seven program items (representative of potential broadcast material). The experiment was performed by groups of experienced and inexperienced listeners. Both groups preferred systems with increased spatial content; nine- and five-channel systems were most preferred. The use of elicited attributes was analyzed alongside the preference ratings, resulting in an approximate hierarchy of attribute importance. Three attributes (amount of distortion, output quality, and bandwidth) were found to be important for differentiating systems where there was a large preference difference; sixteen were always important (most notably enveloping and horizontal width); and seven were used alongside small preference differences. Although the presence of more spatial content increases preference, adding loudspeaker channels does not necessarily give a corresponding increase in preference.

[1]  Sylvain Choisel,et al.  Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Tim Brookes,et al.  Production and Reproduction of Program Material for a Variety of Spatial Audio Formats , 2015 .

[3]  A. Silzle,et al.  Investigation on the Quality of 3 D Sound Reproduction , 2012 .

[4]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  How to Analyze Paired Comparison Data , 2011 .

[5]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[7]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Investigation on the Quality of 3D Sound Reproduction , 2011 .

[8]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[9]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Paired comparison listening tests and circular error rates , 2002 .

[10]  Søren Bech,et al.  Elicitation of attributes for the evaluation of audio-on-audio interference. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Nick Zacharov,et al.  Audio descriptive analysis & mapping of spatial sound displays , 2001 .

[12]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1939 .

[13]  Tim Brookes,et al.  Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences , 2017 .

[14]  Sylvain Choisel,et al.  Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound , 2006 .

[15]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .