Abstract While a considerable body of research, theory, and statistics has developed concerning the “urban crime problem” in America, crime in rural areas has been comparatively neglected. This study addresses that neglect by refining and extending National Crime Panel victimization survey techniques to elicit the victimization experiences, perceptions, fears, and actions of residents of a highly representative rural county in the midwestern United States. The implications of this study are discussed, including the need to educate rural citizens concerning crime prevention in order to reduce their vulnerability to continued victimization. The data suggest that the romanticization surrounding rural America may help mask the fact that increasing diffusion of criminal behavior, along with increasing homogenization of our society, have significantly eroded the rural/urban dichotomy which has dominated criminological inquiry.
[1]
M. B. Clinard.
A Cross-Cultural Replication of the Relation of Urbanism to Criminal Behavior
,
1960
.
[2]
Paul Wiers.
Juvenile Delinquency in Rural Michigan
,
1939
.
[3]
Donald Black,et al.
Production of Crime Rates
,
1970
.
[4]
S. Dinitz.
PROGRESS, CRIME, AND THE FOLK ETHIC Portrait of a Small Town
,
1973
.
[5]
Dale G. Hardman.
Small Town Gangs
,
1969
.
[6]
Marshall B. Clinard.
Rural Criminal Offenders
,
1944,
American Journal of Sociology.
[7]
William P. Lentz.
Rural Urban Differentials and Juvenile Delinquency
,
1956
.
[8]
W. Stein.
Andean Indian Village1
,
1958
.
[9]
E. Bittner,et al.
BURGLARY IN A SUBURB
,
1973
.