Local reservoir model for choice-based learning

Decision making based on behavioral and neural observations of living systems has been extensively studied in brain science, psychology, and other disciplines. Decision-making mechanisms have also been experimentally implemented in physical processes, such as single photons and chaotic lasers. The findings of these experiments suggest that there is a certain common basis in describing decision making, regardless of its physical realizations. In this study, we propose a local reservoir model to account for choice-based learning (CBL). CBL describes decision consistency as a phenomenon where making a certain decision increases the possibility of making that same decision again later, which has been intensively investigated in neuroscience, psychology, etc. Our proposed model is inspired by the viewpoint that a decision is affected by its local environment, which is referred to as a local reservoir. If the size of the local reservoir is large enough, consecutive decision making will not be affected by previous decisions, thus showing lower degrees of decision consistency in CBL. In contrast, if the size of the local reservoir decreases, a biased distribution occurs within it, which leads to higher degrees of decision consistency in CBL. In this study, an analytical approach on local reservoirs is presented, as well as several numerical demonstrations. Furthermore, a physical architecture for CBL based on single photons is discussed, and the effects of local reservoirs is numerically demonstrated. Decision consistency in human decision-making tasks and in recruiting empirical data are evaluated based on local reservoir. In summary, the proposed local reservoir model paves a path toward establishing a foundation for computational mechanisms and the systematic analysis of decision making on different levels.

[1]  Makoto Naruse,et al.  Single Photon in Hierarchical Architecture for Physical Decision Making: Photon Intelligence , 2016 .

[2]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Unlocking the Brain: Volume 1: Coding , 2013 .

[3]  E. Rolls,et al.  Brain mechanisms for perceptual and reward-related decision-making , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Single-photon decision maker , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Jasprit Singh,et al.  Observation of Phonon Bottleneck in Quantum Dot Electronic Relaxation , 2001 .

[6]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  Birger Iversen,et al.  Cohomology of sheaves , 1984 .

[8]  Wolfgang M. Pauli,et al.  Learning, Reward, and Decision Making , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Neural mechanisms of dissonance: An fMRI investigation of choice justification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Madoka Miyagi,et al.  Relation between choice-induced preference change and depression , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Ultrafast photonic reinforcement learning based on laser chaos , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: : An Introduction , 1998 .

[13]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Category Theoretic Analysis of Photon-Based Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[14]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Dayan,et al.  Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans , 2006, Nature.

[16]  Kei Ito,et al.  A single pair of interneurons commands the Drosophila feeding motor program , 2013, Nature.

[17]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[18]  H. Heinze,et al.  The resting brain and our self: Self-relatedness modulates resting state neural activity in cortical midline structures , 2008, Neuroscience.

[19]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Category theoretic foundation of single-photon-based decision making , 2016 .

[20]  K. Sakai,et al.  Autonomous Mechanism of Internal Choice Estimate Underlies Decision Inertia , 2014, Neuron.

[21]  G. Northoff,et al.  Distinction between Externally vs. Internally Guided Decision-Making: Operational Differences, Meta-Analytical Comparisons and Their Theoretical Implications , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[22]  H. Seung,et al.  JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR 2005, 84, 581–617 NUMBER 3(NOVEMBER) LINEAR-NONLINEAR-POISSON MODELS OF PRIMATE CHOICE DYNAMICS , 2022 .

[23]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Makoto Miyatani,et al.  Post-response βγ power predicts the degree of choice-based learning in internally guided decision-making , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Contrasting variability patterns in the default mode and sensorimotor networks balance in bipolar depression and mania , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  P. Glimcher,et al.  JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR 2005, 84, 555–579 NUMBER 3(NOVEMBER) DYNAMIC RESPONSE-BY-RESPONSE MODELS OF MATCHING BEHAVIOR IN RHESUS MONKEYS , 2022 .

[29]  Hideaki Kawabata,et al.  I Choose, Therefore I Like: Preference for Faces Induced by Arbitrary Choice , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  G. Northoff,et al.  How do the brain’s time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC) , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.