The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects

Demonstration of a fully integrated power plant with carbon capture and storage (CCS) at scale has not yet been achieved, despite growing international political interest in the potential of the technology to contribute to climate change mitigation and calls from multiple constituents for more demonstration projects. Acknowledging the scale of learning that still must occur for the technology to advance towards deployment, multiple CCS demonstration projects of various scales are emerging globally. Current plans for learning and knowledge sharing associated with demonstration projects, however, seem to be limited and narrowly conceived, raising questions about whether the projects will deliver on the expectations raised. Through a comparison of the structure, framing and socio-political context of three very different CCS demonstration projects in different places and contexts, this paper explores the complexity of social learning associated with demonstration projects. Variety in expectations of the demonstration projects’ objectives, learning processes, information sharing mechanisms, public engagement initiatives, financing and collaborative partnerships are highlighted. The comparison shows that multiple factors including the process of building support for the project, the governance context and the framing of the project matter for the learning in demonstration projects. This analysis supports a broader conceptualization of learning than that currently found in CCS demonstration plans – a result with implications for both future research and practice.

[1]  August E. Grant,et al.  Framing public life : perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world , 2001 .

[2]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[3]  Scott Jiusto,et al.  Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: Socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA , 2010 .

[4]  Anders Hansson,et al.  Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage—A framing of uncertainties and possibilities , 2009 .

[5]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Selecting and assessing demonstration projects: the case of fuel cells and hydrogen systems in Sweden , 2004 .

[6]  B. Metz,et al.  Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration , 2009 .

[7]  Jim Watson,et al.  CCS in the UK: Squaring coal use with climate change? , 2009 .

[8]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for climate change mitigation , 2006 .

[9]  Kaivan Munshi Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution , 2004 .

[10]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[11]  S. Hyysalo Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[12]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Caching the carbon: the politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. , 2009 .

[13]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[14]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies , 2007 .

[15]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Getting the engineering right is not always enough: researching the human dimensions of the new energy technologies. , 2010 .

[16]  Graham Spinardi Ballistic missile defence and the politics of testing: the case of the US ground-based midcourse defence , 2008 .

[17]  C. Levitt,et al.  "The Whole World Is Watching": Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left , 1981 .

[18]  Todd Gitlin,et al.  The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. , 1983 .

[19]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States , 2010 .

[20]  A. Hansson,et al.  Capturing the stories of corporations: A comparison of media debates on carbon capture and storage in Norway and Sweden , 2011 .

[21]  Jennie C. Stephens Technology Leader, Policy Laggard: CCS Development for Climate Mitigation in the US Political Context , 2009 .

[22]  B. Latour,et al.  Making Things Public : Atmospheres of Democracy , 2005 .

[23]  M. Karlström,et al.  Selecting and assessing demonstration projects for technology assessment: The cases of fuel cells and hydrogen systems in Sweden , 2004 .

[24]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited , 1988 .

[25]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[26]  August E. Grant,et al.  Prologue—Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research , 2001 .

[27]  P. Vergragt CCS in the Netherlands: Glass Half Empty or Half Full? , 2009 .

[28]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[29]  S. Shapin Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology , 1984 .

[30]  E. Rochon,et al.  False hope: why carbon capture and storage won't save the climate. , 2008 .

[31]  Richard Van Noorden Carbon sequestration: Buried trouble , 2010, Nature.