Crop seed spillage along roads : a factor of uncertainty in the containment of GMO

Feral populations of crop species along roadsides contribute to the uncertainty regarding the containment of genetically modified (GM) crops, as the feral populations could promote the persistence of transgenes outside of cultivated fields. Roadside populations of several common crop species are known to occur far from arable fields, and the dispersal pathways that promote their recruitment in road verges are unclear. Human-aided dispersal, in particular adhesive dispersal by vehicles, has been suggested as a possible vector, but this has not yet been proven experimentally. We sampled the seed rain from vehicles inside two motorway tunnels in an urban environment to reveal the contribution of crop species to seeds unintentionally dispersed by traffic beyond agricultural production areas. Three species of arable crops, wheat Triticum aestivum, rye Secale cereale and oilseed rape Brassica napus, were among the most frequent species deposited by vehicles inside the motorway tunnels. Each of the three species was clearly more predominant in one direction of traffic. While seeds of Triticum aestivum and Secale cereale were primarily transported into the city, Brassica napus was significantly more abundant in samples from lanes leading out of the city. Seed sources in the local surroundings of the tunnels were virtually nonexistent, and the high magnitude of seed deposition combined with high seed weights suggests a dispersal mechanism different from other species in the sample, at least for Triticum aestivum and Secale cereale. This provides evidence that spillage during transport is a major driver for long-distance dispersal of crops. Our results suggest that seed dispersal by vehicles is the major driver in the recruitment of roadside populations of arable crops, providing a possible escape route for GM crops. Risk management should thus aim at curbing transport losses of GM crops.

[1]  P. Walklate,et al.  A model of pollen–mediated gene flow for oilseed rape , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Broder Breckling,et al.  Biologische Risikoforschung zu gentechnisch veraenderten Pflanzen in der Landwirtschaft: Das Beispiel Raps in Norddeutschland. , 2003 .

[3]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  J. Gressel,et al.  Crop ferality and volunteerism , 2005 .

[5]  M. Crawley,et al.  Spatially structured population dynamics in feral oilseed rape , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  M. A. Neale,et al.  Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape , 1996 .

[7]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  GENE FLOW IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS OF HERBICIDE‐RESISTANT CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) , 2003 .

[8]  D Hodrinson « Plant dispersal: the role of man » , 1998 .

[9]  M. R. Moore,et al.  Haematological effects of lead. , 1988, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  D. Gustafson,et al.  An empirical model for pollen-mediated gene flow in wheat , 2005 .

[11]  D. Bartsch,et al.  Feral beets - with help from the maritime wild? , 2005 .

[12]  Martin Hermy,et al.  Motor vehicles as vectors of plant species from road verges in a suburban environment. , 2006 .

[13]  Christopher A. Gilligan,et al.  Which traits promote persistence of feral GM crops? Part 2: implications of metapopulation structure , 2005 .

[14]  E. Landolt Flora der Stadt Zürich (1984–1998) , 2001 .

[15]  H. R. Prendeville,et al.  Ecological Effects of Transgenic Crops and the Escape of Transgenes into Wild Populations , 2004 .

[16]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Pathways in Plant Invasions , 2008 .

[17]  C. Lavigne,et al.  High diversity of oilseed rape pollen clouds over an agro‐ecosystem indicates long‐distance dispersal , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[18]  Aurélie Garnier,et al.  Using a spatial and stage-structured invasion model to assess the spread of feral populations of transgenic oilseed rape , 2006 .

[19]  G. Poppy,et al.  Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  W. Schmidt Plant dispersal by motor cars , 1989, Vegetatio.

[21]  J. Bakker,et al.  An improved method for seed-bank analysis : Seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving , 1996 .

[22]  A. Messean,et al.  Persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[23]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Gressel Introduction - the challenges of ferality. , 2005 .

[25]  J. Waines,et al.  Hybridization and Introgression between Bread Wheat and Wild and Weedy Relatives in North America , 2004 .

[26]  P. Lutman,et al.  Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus) , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[27]  F. Viard,et al.  Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  C. J. Thompsona,et al.  Model-based analysis of the likelihood of gene introgression from genetically modified crops into wild relatives , 2003 .

[29]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Long‐Distance Dispersal of Plants by Vehicles as a Driver of Plant Invasions , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  R. Wisskirchen,et al.  Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands , 1998 .