Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances

Two experiments, one on school-aged children and one on adults, explored the mechanisms underlying responses to an image prime (hand vs. control object) followed by graspable objects that were, in certain cases, dangerous. Participants were presented with different primes (a male, a female and a robotic grasping-hand; a male and a female static-hand; a control stimulus) and objects representing two risk levels (neutral and dangerous). The task required that a natural/artifact categorization task be performed by pressing different keys. In both adults and children graspable objects activated a facilitating motor response, while dangerous objects evoked aversive affordances, generating an interference-effect. Both children and adults were sensitive to the distinction between biological and non-biological hands, however detailed resonant mechanisms related to the hand-prime gender emerged only in adults. Implications for how the concept of "dangerous object" develops and the relationship between resonant mechanisms and perception of danger are discussed.

[1]  Domenica Le Pera,et al.  Inhibition of motor system excitability at cortical and spinal level by tonic muscle pain , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Massimiliano Valeriani,et al.  Pain-related modulation of the human motor cortex , 2003, Neurological research.

[3]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Emotive concept nouns and motor responses: Attraction or repulsion? , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[6]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[7]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[9]  Frank Baeyens,et al.  On the generality of the affective Simon effect , 2001 .

[10]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Kids observing other kids’ hands: Visuomotor priming in children , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[12]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  Response-specific effects of pain observation on motor behavior , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Hand–object interaction in perspective , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Patric Bach,et al.  “Feeling” others' painful actions: The sensorimotor integration of pain and action information, , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[15]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Consequences of Automatic Evaluation: Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 1999 .

[16]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[18]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[19]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[20]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Racial Bias Reduces Empathic Sensorimotor Resonance with Other-Race Pain , 2010, Current Biology.

[21]  D. Parisi,et al.  TRoPICALS : A Computational Embodied Neuroscience Model of Experiments on Compatibility Effects , 2010 .

[22]  T. Egner,et al.  Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  L. Vainio,et al.  On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects , 2008, Cognition.

[24]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  A Unified Framework for Inhibitory Control Opinion , 2022 .

[26]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Approach and avoidance as action effects , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  D. Algom,et al.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Roberto Nicoletti,et al.  Self, others, objects: How this triadic interaction modulates our behavior , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[29]  E. Kandel,et al.  Resolving Emotional Conflict: A Role for the Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Modulating Activity in the Amygdala , 2006, Neuron.

[30]  Roberto Nicoletti,et al.  Categorization and action: what about object consistence? , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[31]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: A study with the computational model TRoPICALS , 2013, Psychological research.

[32]  Riitta Parkkola,et al.  Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[34]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  With hands I do not centre! Action- and object-related effects of hand-cueing in the line bisection , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  A. Borghi,et al.  Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. Parisi,et al.  TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. , 2010, Psychological review.

[37]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. , 1999, Acta psychologica.