A DEA-Based Approach for Evaluating the Opportunity Cost of Environmental Regulations

Opportunity costs of environmental regulations (OCER) are an important consideration when governments make decisions on the formulation of environmental policies and when plants make decisions in response to environmental policies. Aimed at measuring OCER, the current paper proposes an approach in which the achievements of environmental control implemented by a production unit are considered. We quantify and define the achievements as "desirable" environmental outputs. In this way, for a production unit, producing normal desirable outputs and reaching environmental outputs is a tradeoff. OCER is measured by calculating a maximum amount of increasable normal outputs when production units do not need to produce any environmental outputs. Directional distance functions and data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques are used to calculate OCER. The approach is applied to an empirical illustration based on Taiwan's port industry covering the period 2001–2007. It is found that the industry incurred opportunity costs due to environmental regulations equivalent to 1.8% of total revenue it creates. However, the OCER are significantly less than the economic losses due to productive inefficiency (PIE).

[1]  Mitsutsugu Hamamoto,et al.  Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[3]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[4]  Carl A. Pasurka,et al.  Technical Change and Measuring Pollution Abatement Costs: An Activity Analysis Framework , 2001 .

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[6]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[7]  Eduardo Martínez-Budría,et al.  A STUDY OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SPANISH PORT AUTHORITIES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[8]  W. Pizer,et al.  Calculating the Cost of Environmental Regulation , 2003 .

[9]  K. Telle,et al.  Consequences of the IPPC’s BAT Requirements for Emissions and Abatement Costs: A DEA Analysis on Norwegian Data , 2008 .

[10]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Bruce Hollingsworth,et al.  Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PORT PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY , 1995 .

[15]  Ronald J. Shadbegian,et al.  Plant Vintage, Technology, and Environmental Regulation , 2001 .

[16]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[17]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[18]  Ronald J. Shadbegian,et al.  Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity: A production function approach , 2005 .

[19]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[20]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? , 1995 .

[21]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[22]  W. Pizer,et al.  The Cost of Environmental Protection , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  W. B. Liu,et al.  DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Yongrok Choi,et al.  The Efficiency of major Ports under Logistics Risk in Northeast Asia , 2011, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[28]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .

[30]  Hurvey Leibenstein Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .