Masonry repair lime-based mortars: factors affecting the mechanical behavior

Abstract The increasing use of lime-based mortars for the restoration of historic buildings and structures justifies the research on these materials. The focus of this paper is the effect of technological variables on pore structure and mechanical properties of lime-based mortars. The influence of curing time, binder–aggregate (B/Ag) ratio, aggregate attributes and porosity is discussed. Mortars prepared with aerial lime, varying aggregate types and B/Ag ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:5 by volume were tested. Compressive and flexural strength measurements, as well as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermal studies, were performed after 3, 7, 28, 91, 182 and 365 days. A strong increase in strength of mortar mixtures after 365 curing days (as compared to 28 curing days) is found. In spite of the fact that larger amounts of binder increase the total porosity, the strength of these mixtures is also increased. A good interlocked structure is obtained as binder contents increase. Also, higher porosities allow better portlandite carbonation. A relationship between mechanical properties and pore structure was established. However, in case of binder excess, the increase in voids leads to a strength reduction. The use of calcareous aggregates improves strength more as compared to the use of siliceous aggregates. Factors as grain size distribution and grain shape of the aggregates have also been considered.

[1]  Antonia Moropoulou,et al.  Earthquake resistant construction techniques and materials on Byzantine monuments in Kiev , 2000 .

[2]  P. Gazzola,et al.  The Venice Charter: International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites , 1964 .

[3]  T. Hatakeyama,et al.  Handbook of Thermal Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Giuseppe Cultrone,et al.  Aging of Lime Putty: Effects on Traditional Lime Mortar Carbonation , 2004 .

[5]  George W. Scherer,et al.  Crystallization in pores , 1999 .

[6]  Clifford Price,et al.  Mortars, Cements and Grouts Used in the Conservation of Historic Buildings , 1984 .

[7]  Luigia Binda,et al.  The role of brick pebbles and dust in conglomerates based on hydrated lime and crushed bricks , 1997 .

[8]  Antonia Moropoulou,et al.  Advanced Byzantine cement based composites resisting earthquake stresses: the crushed brick/lime mortars of Justinian's Hagia Sophia , 2002 .

[9]  R. L. Sharma,et al.  The influence of mineral additives on the strength and porosity of OPC mortar , 2000 .

[10]  A. Moropoulou,et al.  Technology and behavior of rubble masonry mortars , 1997 .

[11]  V. Papadakis,et al.  Effect of lime putty addition on structural and durability properties of concrete , 2002 .

[12]  Humberto R. Roman,et al.  MICROSTRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION OF A SILICA FUME–CEMENT–LIME MORTAR , 2003 .

[13]  M. Waelkens,et al.  Study of ancient mortars from Sagalassos (Turkey) in view of their conservation , 2002 .

[14]  Maria J. Mosquera,et al.  Pore structure in mortars applied on restoration Effect on properties relevant to decay of granite buildings , 2002 .

[15]  A. Hendry Masonry walls: materials and construction , 2001 .

[16]  W. S. Ginell,et al.  Calcium Hydroxide Crystal Evolution upon Aging of Lime Putty , 2005 .

[17]  Domingo Pellicer Daviña El hormigón armado en la construcción arquitectónica , 1989 .

[18]  B T Rosson,et al.  Inelastic behavior of sand-lime mortar joint masonry arches , 1998 .

[19]  A. M. Pérez Ensayos y experiencias de alteración en la conservación de obras de piedra de interés histórico artístico , 1993 .

[20]  M. Heikala,et al.  Limestone-filled pozzolanic cement , 2022 .

[21]  D. Moorehead Cementation by the carbonation of hydrated lime , 1986 .

[22]  P. Rota Rossi-Doria Report on the RILEM Workshop ‘Ancient Mortars and Mortars for Restoration’ Ravello, 9–11 November 1988 , 1990 .