Improving professional IT doctorate completion rates

Professional doctorates in Information Technology (IT) have been a relatively recent phenomenon, giving IT professionals career management choices not previously available to them. However, successful completion rates are the lowest of all disciplines. Completed doctorates rate in quality equivalent to PhDs, and retention has been identified as a major obstacle to completion. This qualitative study, involving 44 semi-structured interviews with students, supervisors and institutional support personnel, investigated the obstacles. Amongst the strategies discovered to improve completion rates were retention, student engagement with supervisors, feedback on progress, student engagement in the course, and student involvement in institutional communities of practice.

[1]  Bill Green,et al.  Organisational knowledge, professional practice and the professional doctorate at work , 2002 .

[2]  Chelt Director.  Coursework in Australian doctoral education: what’s happening, why, and future directions? - CHELT - ANU - CHELT - ANU , 2012 .

[3]  Christine Halse,et al.  ‘Becoming a supervisor’: the impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors' learning , 2011 .

[4]  B. Green.  Addressing the Curriculum Problem in Doctoral Education , 2012 .

[5]  Susan M. Merritt,et al.  Developing a professional doctorate in computing: a fifth-year assessment , 2004, ITiCSE-WGR.

[6]  Sheila Damon,et al.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1992 .

[7]  Lee-Ann Fenge,et al.  Enhancing the doctoral journey: the role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity , 2012 .

[8]  J. McKenzie,et al.  Evaluating doctoral supervision: tensions in eliciting students’ perspectives , 2011 .

[9]  Doris U. Bolliger,et al.  Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings , 2014 .

[10]  B. Crossouard.  Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment , 2008 .

[11]  M. Andrew.  Supervising doctorates at a distance: three trans‐Tasman stories , 2012 .

[12]  David Boud,et al.  Building research supervision and training across Australian universities : final report , 2010 .

[13]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Challenging the taken-for-granted: how research analysis might inform pedagogical practices and institutional policies related to doctoral education , 2012 .

[14]  Deem Rosemary,et al.  Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education , 2005 .

[15]  Dieter Fink.  The Professional Doctorate: Its Relativity to the Ph.D. and Relevance for the Knowledge Economy , 2006 .

[16]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  R. Silbereisen,et al.  Coping with occupational uncertainty and formal volunteering across the life span , 2014 .

[18]  Susan M. Merritt,et al.  A research doctorate for computing professionals , 2011, CACM.

[19]  Julie Carpenter,et al.  Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students , 2012, Inf. Serv. Use.

[20]  Jill Scevak,et al.  Identifying individual differences among doctoral candidates: a framework for understanding problematic candidature , 2012 .

[21]  J. Pryor,et al.  Using email for formative assessment with professional doctorate students , 2009 .

[22]  M. Bond,et al.  New job market entrants' future work self, career adaptability and job search outcomes: Examining mediating and moderating models , 2014 .

[23]  Ginette Berteau,et al.  Integration of the learning process and the group development process in group supervision , 2006 .

[24]  M. Strauss.  Doctor or dropout? , 1969, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  R. Levy,et al.  Supervisor reflections on developing doctoralness in practice‐based doctoral students , 2012 .

[26]  Mike Metcalfe,et al.  Arguing for PhD Coursework , 2000, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Inter-disciplinary doctor of science with computer science and information systems , 2011, ACM-SE '11.

[28]  Frank Alpert,et al.  Doctoral Coursework is Needed in Australasia , 2004 .

[29]  J. Malfroy.  The impact of university–industry research on doctoral programs and practices , 2011 .

[30]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  Subjective career success: A meta-analytic review , 2014 .

[31]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Collaborative Doctoral Education: University-Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge Exchange , 2010 .

[32]  Janice M Morse,et al.  Confusing Categories and Themes , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[33]  Janne Malfroy,et al.  Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work , 2010 .

[34]  Deborah Richards,et al.  Identifying the Education Needs of the Business Analyst: An Australian Study , 2014, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  A. McCallin,et al.  Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice , 2012 .

[36]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[37]  A. Lee.  Some implications of European initiatives for doctoral supervision , 2009 .

[38]  Kenneth H. Smith,et al.  The changing reality of research education in Australia and implications for supervision: a review of the literature , 2008 .

[39]  B. Green,et al.  Re‐imagining doctoral education: Professional Doctorates and beyond , 2009 .

[40]  E. Kritzinger,et al.  A critical investigation into the current shortage of information technology postgraduates produced by Unisa , 2012 .

[41]  L. McAlpine,et al.  ‘Learning supervision’: trial by fire , 2009 .

[42]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..