Comparison of simulated and clinical intracardiac electrograms

Intracardiac electrograms are the key in understanding, interpretation and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. However, electrogram morphologies are strongly variable due to catheter position, orientation and contact. Simulations of intracardiac electrograms can improve comprehension and quantification of influencing parameters and therefore reduce misinterpretations. In this study simulated intracardiac electrograms are analyzed regarding tilt angles of the catheter relative to the propagation direction, electrode tissue distances as well as clinical filter settings. Catheter signals are computed on a realistic 3D catheter geometry using bidomain simulations of cardiac electrophysiology. Thereby high conductivities of the catheter electrodes are taken into account. For validation, simulated electrograms are compared with in vivo electrograms recorded during an EP-study with direct annotation of catheter orientation and tissue contact. Good agreement was reached regarding timing and signal width of simulated and measured electrograms. Correlation was 0.92±0.07 for bipolar, 0.92±0.05 for unipolar distal and 0.80 ± 0.12 for unipolar proximal electrograms for different catheter orientations and locations.

[1]  大友 潔 Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface , 2013 .

[2]  O. Dossel,et al.  Differences in intracardiac signals on a realistic catheter geometry using mono- and bidomain models , 2012, 2012 Computing in Cardiology.

[3]  Sanjay Kharche,et al.  Virtual tissue engineering of the human atrium: modelling pharmacological actions on atrial arrhythmogenesis. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[4]  Daming Wei,et al.  Computer simulation of intracardiac potential with whole-heart model , 2007, Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl..

[5]  Luca Faes,et al.  A Novel Approach to Propagation Pattern Analysis in Intracardiac Atrial Fibrillation Signals , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Vincent Heuveline,et al.  Framework for Modular, Flexible and Efficient Solving the Cardiac Bidomain Equations Using PETSc , 2010 .

[7]  M. Courtemanche,et al.  Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Decomposition of fractionated local electrograms using an analytic signal model based on sigmoid functions , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  V Kremen,et al.  A new approach to automated assessment of fractionation of endocardial electrograms during atrial fibrillation , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[10]  Mathias Wilhelms,et al.  Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  Olaf Dössel,et al.  A new approach for automated location of active segments in intracardiac electrograms , 2009 .

[12]  Jean-Marc Vesin,et al.  Estimating the time scale and anatomical location of atrial fibrillation spontaneous termination in a biophysical model , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  C. Henriquez,et al.  Study of Unipolar Electrogram Morphology in a Computer Model of Atrial Fibrillation , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Wave-Direction and Conduction-Velocity Analysis From Intracardiac Electrograms–A Single-Shot Technique , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Genesis of the monophasic action potential: role of interstitial resistance and boundary gradients. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[16]  Mathias Wilhelms,et al.  Benchmarking electrophysiological models of human atrial myocytes , 2013, Front. Physio..