Ventilation response thresholds do not change with age or self-reinforcement in workers of the bumble bee Bombus impatiens

The response threshold model is a potential mechanism for task allocation in social insects, and it assumes that workers vary in the levels of task stimuli to which they respond. Furthermore, response thresholds of individual workers may change over time through self-reinforcement (experience), such that workers become more sensitive to task stimuli. However, in addition to self-reinforcement, aging is another process that occurs through time. Distinguishing whether response thresholds change within workers due to self-reinforcement or aging may give insight into the flexibility of this task allocation mechanism. Using a ventilation paradigm, we manipulated workers of Bombus impatiens to have either repeated or lack of exposures to increases in nest air temperature, thereby allowing us to manipulate experience and thus self-reinforcement. Nest air temperature was the task stimulus, and ventilation (fanning) was the behavioral response. We found that ventilation response thresholds do not decrease either with age or experience in workers of B. impatiens, contrary to what has been reported for B. terrestris workers (Weidenmüller, 2004). Instead, we found high levels of intra-individual variation in response thresholds. Our results also show that workers with lower average response thresholds respond to heating events with higher probability than those with higher ventilation thresholds. These results provide insight into the role of the response threshold framework for task allocation; we also discuss how response probabilities may play a role in task allocation among workers.

[1]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Response Threshold Reinforcement and Division of Labor in Insect Societies , 1998 .

[2]  S. O’Donnell,et al.  Experimental analysis of worker division of labor in bumblebee nest thermoregulation (Bombus huntii, Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Mark J. F. Brown,et al.  Bumblebees: Behaviour and Ecology By DAVE GOULSON. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2003). Pp. ix+235. Price £55.00 hardback, £27.50 paperback , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Christoph Kleineidam,et al.  Collective control of nest climate parameters in bumblebee colonies , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  F. D. Vogt Thermoregulation in Bumblebee Colonies. I. Thermoregulatory versus Brood-Maintenance Behaviors during Acute Changes in Ambient Temperature , 1986, Physiological Zoology.

[7]  T. Pankiw,et al.  The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  F. Roces,et al.  Preimaginal and Adult Experience Modulates the Thermal Response Behavior of Ants , 2009, Current Biology.

[9]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[10]  S. Schneider,et al.  Intra-Patriline Variability in the Performance of the Vibration Signal and Waggle Dance in the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera , 2008 .

[11]  T. C. Ings,et al.  Unterschiede im Lernverhalten zwischen Kolonien einer freilebenden Britischen Hummelpopulation (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus terrestris audax) , 2006 .

[12]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[13]  John B. Free,et al.  Bumblebee economics , 1979, Nature.

[14]  J C Stout,et al.  Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Ingrid H. Williams Bumblebees … , 1975, Nature.

[16]  Dave Goulson,et al.  Bumblebees: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation , 2003 .

[17]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  Anja Weidenmüller,et al.  The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response , 2004 .

[19]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  J. Fewell,et al.  Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Sean O'Donnell,et al.  Thresholds of Response in Nest Thermoregulation by Worker Bumble Bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2001 .

[22]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[23]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  S. Cameron Temporal Patterns of Division of Labor among Workers in the Primitively Eusocial Bumble Bee, Bombus griseocollis (Hymenoptera: Apidae)) , 2010 .

[25]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Ontogeny of worker body size distribution in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies , 2010, Ecological entomology.

[26]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[27]  Benjamin P. Oldroyd,et al.  Nest thermoregulation in social insects , 2006 .