Every Colour You Are: Stance Prediction and Turnaround in Controversial Issues

Web platforms have allowed political manifestation and debate for decades. Technology changes have brought new opportunities for expression, and the availability of longitudinal data of these debates entice new questions regarding who participates, and who updates their opinion. The aim of this work is to provide a methodology to measure these phenomena, and to test this methodology on a specific topic, abortion, as observed on one of the most popular micro-blogging platforms. To do so, we followed the discussion on Twitter about abortion in two Spanish-speaking countries from 2015 to 2018. Our main insights are two fold. On the one hand, people adopted new technologies to express their stances, particularly colored variations of heart emojis ( & ) in a way that mirrored physical manifestations on abortion. On the other hand, even on issues with strong opinions, opinions can change, and these changes show differences in demographic groups. These findings imply that debate on the Web embraces new ways of stance adherence, and that changes of opinion can be measured and characterized.

[1]  Scott Counts,et al.  Gender and Ideology in the Spread of Anti-Abortion Policy , 2016, CHI.

[2]  Wei Niu,et al.  BiasWatch: A Lightweight System for Discovering and Tracking Topic-Sensitive Opinion Bias in Social Media , 2015, CIKM.

[3]  S. Ernala,et al.  Analyzing Ideological Discourse on Social Media: A Case Study of the Abortion Debate , 2017 .

[4]  Marian Sawer,et al.  Wearing your Politics on your Sleeve: The Role of Political Colours in Social Movements , 2007 .

[5]  Dallas Card,et al.  The Importance of Calibration for Estimating Proportions from Annotations , 2018, NAACL.

[6]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[7]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles , 2011, CHI.

[8]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Bias on the web , 2002, CACM.

[9]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  A Long-Term Analysis of Polarization on Twitter , 2017, ICWSM.

[10]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[11]  Calum Miller,et al.  Arguments about Abortion: Personhood, Morality, and Law , 2018, The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body.

[12]  Rich Caruana,et al.  Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning , 2005, ICML.

[13]  Barbara Sutton,et al.  Abortion Rights in Images: Visual Interventions by Activist Organizations in Argentina , 2020, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[14]  Maria I. Rodriguez,et al.  Tweeting PP: an analysis of the 2015-2016 Planned Parenthood controversy on Twitter. , 2016, Contraception.

[15]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  The effect of collective attention on controversial debates on social media , 2017 .

[16]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship , 2018, WWW.

[17]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions: Public Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex-Marriage Cases , 2018, Journal of Law and Courts.

[18]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  From Stances' Imbalance to Their HierarchicalRepresentation and Detection , 2019, WWW.

[19]  Xuanzhe Liu,et al.  Through a Gender Lens: Learning Usage Patterns of Emojis from Large-Scale Android Users , 2017, WWW.

[20]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  "Blissfully Happy" or "Ready toFight": Varying Interpretations of Emoji , 2016, ICWSM.

[21]  Bonnie L Shepard,et al.  Abortion Policies and Practices in Chile: Ambiguities and Dilemmas , 2007, Reproductive health matters.

[22]  Amy Booth.  Argentina votes on bill to legalise abortion up to 14 weeks , 2018, The Lancet.

[23]  J. Alterman.  The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted , 2011 .

[24]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  How Representative is an Abortion Debate on Twitter? , 2019, WebSci.

[25]  Burt L. Monroe,et al.  Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict , 2008, Political Analysis.

[26]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasm , 2017, EMNLP.

[27]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Quantifying Controversy on Social Media , 2018, ACM Trans. Soc. Comput..

[28]  Horacio Saggion,et al.  How Cosmopolitan Are Emojis?: Exploring Emojis Usage and Meaning over Different Languages with Distributional Semantics , 2016, ACM Multimedia.

[29]  JudieBrown.  Talking about Abortion , 2014 .

[30]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Classifying Political Orientation on Twitter: It's Not Easy! , 2013, ICWSM.

[31]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  Political hashtag hijacking in the U.S. , 2013, WWW.

[32]  Adela Montero,et al.  A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile , 2018, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[33]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Finding Intermediary Topics Between People of Opposing Views: A Case Study , 2015, SPS@SIGIR.

[34]  Fabian Flöck,et al.  Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Data , 2019, WWW.

[35]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Online social networks and offline protest , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[36]  Ana-Maria Popescu,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach to Twitter User Classification , 2011, ICWSM.

[37]  M. Williams,et al.  Who Tweets? Deriving the Demographic Characteristics of Age, Occupation and Social Class from Twitter User Meta-Data , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Representativeness of Abortion Legislation Debate on Twitter: A Case Study in Argentina and Chile , 2020, WWW.

[39]  Wenjun Zhou,et al.  The World Wants Mangoes and Kangaroos: A Study of New Emoji Requests Based on Thirty Million Tweets , 2019, WWW.

[40]  Chaya Liebeskind,et al.  Emoji Prediction for Hebrew Political Domain , 2019, WWW.

[41]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.