Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint in the Wine Supply-Chain

Global warming represents one of the most critical internationally perceived environmental issues. The growing, and increasingly global, wine sector is one of the industries which is under increasing pressure to adopt approaches for environmental assessment and reporting of product-related greenhouse gas emissions. The International Organization for Vine and Wine has recently recognized the need to develop a standard and objective methodology and a related tool for calculating carbon footprint (CF). This study applied this tool to a wine previously analyzed using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The objective was to test the tool as regards both its potential and possible limitations, and thus to assess its suitability as a standard tool. Despite the tool’s user-friendliness, a number of limitations were noted including the lack of accurate baseline data, a partial system boundary and the impossibility of dealing with the multi-functionality issue. When the CF and LCA results are compared in absolute terms, large discrepancies become obvious due to a number of different assumptions, as well as the modeling framework adopted. Nonetheless, in relative terms the results seem to be quite consistent. However, a critical limitation of the CF methodology was its focus on a single issue, which can lead to burden shifting. In conclusion, the study confirmed the need for both further improvement and adaptation to additional contexts and further studies to validate the use of this tool in different companies.

[1]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[2]  A. Pizzigallo,et al.  The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[4]  H. Willer,et al.  The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2012 , 2008 .

[5]  John Tzilivakis,et al.  Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods , 2007 .

[6]  Susanne Padel,et al.  The european market for organic food , 2008 .

[7]  Kevin Dooley,et al.  The Sustainability Consortium: A Stakeholder Approach to Improve Consumer Product Sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher Naugler,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada , 2012 .

[9]  M. Loureiro Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels , 2003 .

[10]  Pramod K. Aggarwal,et al.  Carbon footprints of Indian food items , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas Oppermann,et al.  European Economic Community. , 1967, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[12]  A. Fearne,et al.  Sustainable value chain analysis: a case study of South Australian wine , 2009 .

[13]  B. Weidema,et al.  Carbon Footprint , 2008 .

[14]  Vicki C. Waye Carbon Footprints, Food Miles and the Australian Wine Industry , 2008 .

[15]  Heiner Imkamp The Interest of Consumers in Ecological Product Information Is Growing – Evidence From Two German Surveys , 2000 .

[16]  Cristina Gazulla,et al.  Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks? , 2010 .

[17]  Hokey Min,et al.  Green Purchasing Strategies: Trends and Implications , 1997 .

[18]  Juan Luis Doménech Quesada,et al.  A Methodological Proposal for Corporate Carbon Footprint and Its Application to a Wine-Producing Company in Galicia, Spain , 2009 .

[19]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[20]  M. Cellura,et al.  POEMS: A Case Study of an Italian Wine-Producing Firm , 2006, Environmental management.