Amine-reactive Neutron-encoded Labels for Highly Plexed Proteomic Quantitation*

We describe a novel amine-reactive chemical label that exploits differential neutron-binding energy between 13C and 15N isotopes. These neutron-encoded (NeuCode) chemical labels enable up to 12-plex MS1-based protein quantification. Each structurally identical, but isotopically unique, tag is encoded with a 12.6-mDa mass difference—relative to its nearest neighbor—so that peptides bearing these NeuCode signatures do not increase spectral complexity and are detected only upon analysis with very high mass-resolving powers. We demonstrate that the method provides quantitative performance that is comparable to both metabolic labeling and isobaric tagging while combining the benefits of both strategies. Finally, we employ the tags to characterize the proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the diauxic shift, a metabolic transition from fermentation to aerobic respiration.

[1]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[2]  J. Stewart Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis , 1984 .

[3]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  Increasing the multiplexing capacity of TMTs using reporter ion isotopologues with isobaric masses. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  Full Dynamic Range Proteome Analysis of S. cerevisiae by Targeted Proteomics , 2009, Cell.

[5]  B. Futcher,et al.  A Sampling of the Yeast Proteome , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  William S York,et al.  Quantitation by isobaric labeling: applications to glycomics. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics. , 2003, Methods.

[8]  Alexander Makarov,et al.  Orbitrap mass spectrometry with resolving powers above 1,000,000 , 2012 .

[9]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Benchmarking stable isotope labeling based quantitative proteomics. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[10]  Derek J. Bailey,et al.  COMPASS: A suite of pre‐ and post‐search proteomics software tools for OMSSA , 2011, Proteomics.

[11]  A. Heck,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics by Metabolic Labeling of Model Organisms* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  Craig D Wenger,et al.  Analysis of tandem mass spectra by FTMS for improved large-scale proteomics with superior protein quantification. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  D R Mani,et al.  iTRAQ Labeling is Superior to mTRAQ for Quantitative Global Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  A. Heck,et al.  Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  H. Boucherie,et al.  Dissecting regulatory networks by means of two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis: Application to the study of the diauxic shift in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Proteomics.

[16]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Triplex protein quantification based on stable isotope labeling by peptide dimethylation applied to cell and tissue lysates , 2008, Proteomics.

[17]  P. Mortensen,et al.  Temporal profiling of the adipocyte proteome during differentiation using a five-plex SILAC based strategy. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Ishtiaq Rehman,et al.  iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  M. Bantscheff,et al.  High-resolution enabled TMT 8-plexing. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  M. Mann,et al.  SILAC Mouse for Quantitative Proteomics Uncovers Kindlin-3 as an Essential Factor for Red Blood Cell Function , 2008, Cell.

[21]  Derek J. Bailey,et al.  Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multi-plexed proteome quantification , 2013, Nature Methods.

[22]  K. Fearon,et al.  Structure and function of MRP20 and MRP49, the nuclear genes for two proteins of the 54 S subunit of the yeast mitochondrial ribosome. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Peptide Labeling with Isobaric Tags Yields Higher Identification Rates Using iTRAQ 4-Plex Compared to TMT 6-Plex and iTRAQ 8-Plex on LTQ Orbitrap , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  B. Wittmann-Liebold,et al.  Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) of yeast. , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[25]  Mark D'Ascenzo,et al.  8‐Plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer's disease , 2007, Proteomics.

[26]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  The impact of peptide abundance and dynamic range on stable-isotope-based quantitative proteomic analyses. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  M. Karas,et al.  Neutral loss fragmentation pattern based screening for arginine-rich natural products in Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[29]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  P. Sieber A new acid-labile anchor group for the solid-phase synthesis of C-terminal peptide amides by the Fmoc method. , 1987 .

[31]  A. Marshall,et al.  High-resolution mass spectrometers. , 2008, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[32]  M. Mann,et al.  Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue , 2010, Nature Methods.

[33]  R. B. Merrifield Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. the synthesis of a tetrapeptide , 1963 .

[34]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  S. Gygi,et al.  ms3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative , 2011 .

[36]  M. Mann,et al.  Ultra High Resolution Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Orbitrap Elite) Facilitates Top Down LC MS/MS and Versatile Peptide Fragmentation Modes* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  Alexander Makarov,et al.  Performance evaluation of a high-field orbitrap mass analyzer , 2009, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[38]  F. Cross,et al.  Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Mann,et al.  System-wide Perturbation Analysis with Nearly Complete Coverage of the Yeast Proteome by Single-shot Ultra HPLC Runs on a Bench Top Orbitrap* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[40]  Jennifer M. Bolin,et al.  Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.

[41]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[42]  L. Sleno,et al.  The use of mass defect in modern mass spectrometry. , 2012, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[43]  J. Kelly,et al.  Improving mass spectrometric sequencing of arginine-containing peptides by derivatization with acetylacetone. , 1997, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[44]  Craig D Wenger,et al.  Phosphoproteomics for the masses. , 2010, ACS chemical biology.

[45]  A. English,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the yeast proteome by incorporation of isotopically labeled leucine. , 2002, Journal of proteome research.

[46]  P. Manow ‚The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly‘ , 2002 .

[47]  M. Senko,et al.  High-performance mass spectrometry: Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance at 14.5 Tesla. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[48]  John D. Storey A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .