Morphology of Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Individual Differences in Fixation Duration during Text Reading

In skilled reading, fixations are brief periods of time in which the eyes settle on words. E-Z Reader, a computational model of dynamic reading, posits that fixation durations are under real-time control of lexical processing. Lexical processing, in turn, requires efficient visual encoding. Here we tested the hypothesis that individual differences in fixation durations are related to individual differences in the efficiency of early visual encoding. To test this hypothesis, we recorded participants' eye movements during reading. We then examined individual differences in fixation duration distributions as a function of individual differences in the morphology of primary visual cortex measured from MRI scans. The results showed that greater gray matter surface area and volume in visual cortex predicted shorter and less variable fixation durations in reading. These results suggest that individual differences in eye movements during skilled reading are related to initial visual encoding, consistent with models such as E-Z Reader that emphasize lexical control over fixation time.

[1]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[2]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  FreeSurfer , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[8]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Lexical Quality and Eye Movements: Individual Differences in the Perceptual Span of Skilled Adult Readers , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[12]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control , 2009, Vision Research.

[13]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[16]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  Arno Klein,et al.  101 Labeled Brain Images and a Consistent Human Cortical Labeling Protocol , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[18]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Henderson,et al.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Distribution of Fixation Durations During Reading : Effects of Stimulus Quality , 2011 .

[22]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  K. Rayner.  The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  F. Lin,et al.  Onset timing of cross‐sensory activations and multisensory interactions in auditory and visual sensory cortices , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[27]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Temporal Oculomotor Inhibition of Return and Spatial Facilitation of Return in a Visual Encoding Task , 2013 .

[28]  D. Reisberg.  The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology , 2013 .

[29]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. , 2013, Developmental review : DR.

[31]  J. Henderson,et al.  Neural correlates of active vision: An fMRI comparison of natural reading and scene viewing , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[35]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Neural correlates of fixation duration in natural reading: Evidence from fixation-related fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[36]  Marcin Szwed,et al.  Effects of Literacy in Early Visual and Occipitotemporal Areas of Chinese and French Readers , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling , 2007, Vision Research.

[38]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  E. Vogel,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How to Exploit Diversity for Scientific Gain Using Individual Differences to Constrain Cognitive Theory , 2022 .

[41]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Neural Correlates of Fixation Duration during Real-world Scene Viewing: Evidence from Fixation-related (FIRE) fMRI , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from mindless reading , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[44]  Brett Miller,et al.  Opening a Window Into Reading Development: Eye Movements' Role Within a Broader Literacy Research Framework , 2013, School psychology review.

[45]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Specialization for written words over objects in the visual cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[46]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  Hazel I. Blythe,et al.  Children’s eye movements during reading , 2011 .