Coming to your senses: promoting critical thinking about sensors through playful interaction in classrooms

Learning through exploration is assumed to be a powerful way of introducing children to computer science concepts. However, it is uncertain how exploring physical computing toolkits can promote movement between conceptual knowledge and abstract reflection, and lead to critical thinking about technology. We investigated how children aged 9-11 years explored and reasoned about personal and environmental data sensors, using a playful exploration-based physical toolkit in their classroom. We report on the ways in which critical thinking about sensor accuracy and reliability developed through reflective dialogue and playful interaction, taking into account the support structures embedded in the classroom. Finally, we discuss strategies for designing exploration-based learning for classroom settings, to promote critical thinking about data sensing.

[1]  Peter A. Facione,et al.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report) , 1990 .

[2]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  From computational thinking to computational making , 2015, UbiComp.

[3]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Getting Down to Details: Using Theories of Cognition and Learning to Inform Tangible User Interface Design , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[4]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[5]  E. Lai,et al.  Critical Thinking: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[6]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[8]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Appropriating Quantified Self Technologies to Support Elementary Statistical Teaching and Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Learning through digitally-augmented physical experiences: Reflections on the ambient wood project. , 2002 .

[10]  Sharon Bailin,et al.  Common misconceptions of critical thinking , 1999 .

[11]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[12]  Robert H. Ennis.  A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. , 1985 .

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  D. Garrison.  Critical Thinking and Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education: An Analysis of Responsibility and Control Issues , 1992 .

[15]  Ahmed Kharrufa,et al.  ThinkActive: Designing for Pseudonymous Activity Tracking in the Classroom , 2018, CHI.

[16]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Physikit: Data Engagement Through Physical Ambient Visualizations in the Home , 2016, CHI.

[17]  J. Piaget.  The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[18]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors , 2004, IDC '04.

[19]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Quantified recess: design of an activity for elementary students involving analyses of their own movement data , 2013, IDC.

[20]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning , 2012 .

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Inclusive Computing in Special Needs Classrooms: Designing for All , 2018, CHI.

[22]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning: A literature review , 2017, Entertain. Comput..

[23]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[24]  Brian Webb,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning in Computer Supported Co-Operative Learning , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Sue Sentance,et al.  "Creating Cool Stuff": Pupils' Experience of the BBC micro:bit , 2017, SIGCSE.

[26]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Make or Shake: An Empirical Study of the Value of Making in Learning about Computing Technology , 2016, IDC.

[28]  Sue Sentance,et al.  Teaching with physical computing devices: the BBC micro:bit initiative , 2017, WiPSCE.

[29]  S. Hannabuss.  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education , 2003 .

[30]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[31]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction , 2006, CHI.

[32]  P. Facione.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. , 1990 .

[33]  D. Halpern.  Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics. , 1992 .