Abstract : Engineering the total ship as an integrated system using systems engineering, not merely the physical aggregate of systems designed by disparate organizations, has been recognized as the key to designing and producing these complex entities in an effective and affordable manner. The engineering of the total ship has proven to be difficult to integrate, however, especially since the two main disciplines, naval architecture and combat systems, operate in distinct domains. In addition, the engineering task is becoming ever more of a challenge, now that the ship as a system' is being re-defined as ship as part of the battle group system-of-systems'. The expanded system context forces engineers to deal with complexity as an integral characteristic of the process. This paper presents the impacts associated with engineering the total ship from these two important aspects, the differing design domain perspectives and the redefining of the engineering task as relating to a system-of-systems, and outlines a possible framework to allow a more generalized and rigorous design approach.
[1]
Alan Brown.
Reengineering the Naval Ship Concept Design Process
,
1998
.
[2]
Farrokh Mistree,et al.
DECISION-BASED DESIGN - A CONTEMPORARY PARADIGM FOR SHIP DESIGN
,
1990
.
[3]
Dean A. Rains.
A system engineering approach to surface combatant design issues
,
1990
.
[4]
John R. Koza,et al.
Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity.
,
1995,
Artificial Life.
[5]
Nam P. Suh,et al.
Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications
,
2001
.
[6]
William A. Hockberger,et al.
Total System Ship Design in a Supersystem Framework
,
1996
.
[7]
Lcdr. Michael R. Reed.
A LOGICAL, INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NAVAL COMBATANT DESIGN
,
1981
.
[8]
Robert G. Keane,et al.
NAVAL SHIP DESIGN - EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION?
,
1988
.
[9]
Dj Andrews.
CREATIVE SHIP DESIGN
,
1981
.