Using Randomization Tests to Preserve Type I Error With Response-Adaptive and Covariate-Adaptive Randomization.

We demonstrate that clinical trials using response adaptive randomized treatment assignment rules are subject to substantial bias if there are time trends in unknown prognostic factors and standard methods of analysis are used. We develop a general class of randomization tests based on generating the null distribution of a general test statistic by repeating the adaptive randomized treatment assignment rule holding fixed the sequence of outcome values and covariate vectors actually observed in the trial. We develop broad conditions on the adaptive randomization method and the stochastic mechanism by which outcomes and covariate vectors are sampled that ensure that the type I error is controlled at the level of the randomization test. These conditions ensure that the use of the randomization test protects the type I error against time trends that are independent of the treatment assignments. Under some conditions in which the prognosis of future patients is determined by knowledge of the current randomization weights, the type I error is not strictly protected. We show that response-adaptive randomization can result in substantial reduction in statistical power when the type I error is preserved. Our results also ensure that type I error is controlled at the level of the randomization test for adaptive stratification designs used for balancing covariates.

[1]  J. Ware,et al.  Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. , 1985, Pediatrics.

[2]  R. Simon,et al.  Adaptive treatment assignment methods and clinical trials. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  M. Zelen,et al.  Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial , 1969 .

[4]  D R Taves,et al.  Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups , 1974, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[6]  B. Turnbull,et al.  Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[7]  P. Armitage The search for optimality in clinical trials , 1985 .

[8]  Dezheng Huo,et al.  A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  J M Lachin,et al.  The use of response-adaptive designs in clinical trials. , 1993, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  Colin B. Begg,et al.  On inferences from Wei's biased coin design for clinical trials , 1990 .

[11]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[12]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[13]  G. Weiss,et al.  Comparison of sampling methods for choosing the best binomial population with delayed observations , 1975 .

[14]  Nitin R. Patel,et al.  Constructing exact significance tests with restricted randomization rules , 1988 .