Transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation of the contralateral visual field in awake monkey

In this work, we investigated the effect of low intensity pulsed focused ultrasound in the brain of two awake Maccaca Mulatta monkeys using the antisaccade (AS) paradigm. The objective of the study was to determine if transcranial ultrasound has an effect on behavioural tasks in awake animal involving a specific brain structure. Two Maccaca Mulatta monkeys (Y and L) were trained to perform antisaccade (AS) movements where they initially have to fix a central stimulus on a screen and then refrain from looking at an appearing peripheral target but instead initiate as soon as possible a saccade towards the opposite direction. In order to investigate the effect of low intensity focused ultrasound, a continuous 100 ms sonication pulse (derated pressure estimated at 0.35 ± 0.05 MPa) was focused at the frontal eye field using a 320 kHz transducer (H115, Sonic Concept, Bothell, WA, USA). Ipsilateral mean AS latencies with ultrasound stimulation were significantly (t-test;monkey Y: p=.0345, monkey L: p= .0311) increased compared to the non-stimulation condition (monkey Y: +14ms; monkey L: +15 ms). The study demonstrates the feasibility of using focused ultrasound to causally modulate behaviour in awake non-human primate brain.

[1]  Richard T. Marrocco,et al.  Saccades induced by stimulation of the frontal eye fields: Interaction with voluntary and reflexive eye movements , 1978, Brain Research.

[2]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Optogenetically Induced Behavioral and Functional Network Changes in Primates , 2012, Current Biology.

[3]  K. Ressler,et al.  Targeting abnormal neural circuits in mood and anxiety disorders: from the laboratory to the clinic , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  W. Newsome,et al.  Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[6]  W. Fry,et al.  Production of reversible changes in the central nervous system by ultrasound. , 1958, Science.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  James J. Choi,et al.  Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[9]  Fabrice Marquet,et al.  In vivo transcranial brain surgery with an ultrasonic time reversal mirror. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  V. Walsh,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Fields during Pro- and Antisaccade Tasks , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[11]  Yusuf Tufail,et al.  Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Lars Michels,et al.  Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound: noninvasive central lateral thalamotomy for chronic neuropathic pain. , 2012, Neurosurgical focus.

[15]  J. Kennedy High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  J.-L. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasonic beam focusing through tissue inhomogeneities with a time reversal mirror: application to transskull therapy , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Longhui Zhang Shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Remote Control of Neuronal Activity with a Light-Gated Glutamate Receptor , 2007, Neuron.

[20]  Daniel Jeanmonod,et al.  Measurement of targeting accuracy in focused ultrasound functional neurosurgery. , 2012, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  E. E. Shchekanov,et al.  The effect of focused ultrasound on the skin and deep nerve structures of man and animal. , 1976, Progress in brain research.

[22]  B. Gaymard,et al.  Eye movement disorders after frontal eye field lesions in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Chantal François,et al.  Frontal Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Modulates Antisaccade Preparation in Non-Human Primates , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  M. Fink,et al.  Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation. , 2013, Medical physics.

[25]  M Tanter,et al.  Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Mathieu Pernot,et al.  Targeting accuracy of transcranial magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound brain therapy: a fresh cadaver model. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Potential intracranial applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Trans-skull ultrasound therapy: the feasibility of using image-derived skull thickness information to correct the phase distortion , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  S. Tillery,et al.  Transcranial Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulates Intact Brain Circuits , 2010, Neuron.