Benchmarking rWG Interrater Agreement Indices: Let's Drop the .70 Rule-Of-Thumb

An apparatus for controlling a PWM controlled inverter adapted to effect the waveform control of the inverter output voltage in accordance with the memory content of ROM in which instantaneous output voltage data are memorized. This control apparatus comprises a ROM in which the instantaneous output voltage outputs thereof in the PWM control are memorized, and in which the number of addresses within a predetermined electrical angle section is set to a fixed value irrespective of the number of switching times within the electrical angle section, an electrical angle counter in which duration corresponding to the duration time data read from the ROM is set, an address counter responding to the count-up of the electrical angle counter to advance the read address of the ROM, and a controller for controlling the output voltage of the inverter in accordance with an instantaneous output voltage corresponding to the instantaneous output voltage data read from the ROM.

[1]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  EVALUATING CLASSIFICATIONS OF JOB BEHAVIOR: A CONSTRUCT VALIDATION OF THE ABILITY REQUIREMENT SCALES , 2006 .

[2]  M. Lindell,et al.  Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Measuring Interrater Agreement for Ratings of a Single Target , 1997 .

[4]  K. Murphy,et al.  PROGRESS IN PSYCHOMETRICS: CAN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY CATCH UP? , 2000 .

[5]  M. Lindell,et al.  A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target , 1999 .

[6]  S. K. Mitchell.  Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. , 1979 .

[7]  Norman G. Peterson,et al.  An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. , 1999 .

[8]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[9]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[10]  E Doveh,et al.  Statistical properties of the rWG(J) index of agreement. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[11]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  K. Dirks.  Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  R. J. House,et al.  Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 2001 .

[14]  Kristin Smith-Crowe,et al.  Accurate tests of statistical significance for r(WG) and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS , 2000 .

[16]  M. Lindell,et al.  Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of CVI, T, r-sub(WG(J)), and r*-sub(WG(J)) indexes. , 1999 .

[17]  D. Zohar.  A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  T. Judge,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[21]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[22]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH , 2001 .

[23]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  RELIABILITY IS NOT VALIDITY AND VALIDITY IS NOT RELIABILITY , 2000 .

[24]  Phil Lewis,et al.  Revision of O*NET Data Collection Instruments , 2000 .

[25]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments , 1975 .