Advancing the Next Generation of Health Risk Assessment

Background: Over the past 20 years, knowledge of the genome and its function has increased dramatically, but risk assessment methodologies using such knowledge have not advanced accordingly. Objective: This commentary describes a collaborative effort among several federal and state agencies to advance the next generation of risk assessment. The objective of the NexGen program is to begin to incorporate recent progress in molecular and systems biology into risk assessment practice. The ultimate success of this program will be based on the incorporation of new practices that facilitate faster, cheaper, and/or more accurate assessments of public health risks. Methods: We are developing prototype risk assessments that compare the results of traditional, data-rich risk assessments with insights gained from new types of molecular and systems biology data. In this manner, new approaches can be validated, traditional approaches improved, and the value of different types of new scientific information better understood. Discussion and Conclusions: We anticipate that these new approaches will have a variety of applications, such as assessment of new and existing chemicals in commerce and the design of chemical products and processes that reduce or eliminate the use or generation of hazardous substances. Additionally, results of the effort are likely to spur further research and test methods development. Full implementation of new approaches is likely to take 10–20 years.

[1]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Global Affairs Division Sustainability and the U.S. EPA , 2011 .

[3]  Weihsueh A Chiu,et al.  Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[4]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Analysis of eight oil spill dispersants using rapid, in vitro tests for endocrine and other biological activity. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Linda S. Birnbaum,et al.  The Office of Health Assessment and Translation: A Problem-Solving Resource for the National Toxicology Program , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Philip Carthew,et al.  A proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[8]  Ann Richard,et al.  Advancing Exposure Characterization for Chemical Evaluation and Risk Assessment , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[9]  Jan G. Hengstler,et al.  Highlight report: towards the replacement of in vivo repeated dose systemic toxicity testing , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[10]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Community address: www.elsevier.com/locate/mutres Review , 2022 .

[11]  Kevin M. Crofton,et al.  Thyroid-Disrupting Chemicals: Interpreting Upstream Biomarkers of Adverse Outcomes , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  E. Hubal,et al.  Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assessment , 2011 .

[13]  Paul Anastas,et al.  Ensuring the safety of chemicals , 2010, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[14]  Luoping Zhang,et al.  Current understanding of the mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia in humans: implications for risk assessment. , 2012, Carcinogenesis.

[15]  Paul Anastas,et al.  Green chemistry: principles and practice. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[16]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  A graphical systems model and tissue-specific functional gene sets to aid transcriptomic analysis of chemical impacts on the female teleost reproductive axis. , 2012, Mutation research.

[18]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[19]  Michael A. Gallo,et al.  Role of Environmental Chemicals in Diabetes and Obesity: A National Toxicology Program Workshop Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Systems biology and mode of action based risk assessment. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[21]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[22]  S. Polasky,et al.  Sustainability and the U.S. EPA , 2011 .

[23]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  Application of transcriptional benchmark dose values in quantitative cancer and noncancer risk assessment. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  R. Judson,et al.  Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[27]  Catherine Blake,et al.  Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from full-text biomedical articles , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.