Relative Importance of Rate and Place: Experiments Using Pitch Scaling Techniques with Cochlear Implant Recipients

Pitch scaling was used to determine the dependence of perceived pitch on rate and place of stimulation in postlingually deafened adult subjects using cochlear implants. For stimulation rates below about 500 pulses per second (pps), perceived pitch is a strong function of both rate and place. In this range, perceived pitch increases logarithmically with stimulation rate, but decreases with distance from the round window. A 2-mm displacement into the cochlea has an effect similar to that of halving the stimulation rate. Place resolution in this context is comparable with the interelectrode spacing (0.75 mm). At rates approaching 1,000 pps, rate has little effect on perceived pitch. An average of bipolar quality judgments showed that periodic pulsatile stimulation is least pleasant when low frequencies are applied to the region closest to the window.

[1]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S Pijl Pulse Rate Matching by Cochlear Implant Patients: Effects of Loudness Randomization and Electrode Position , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[3]  M F Dorman,et al.  The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H J McDermott,et al.  Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D W Schwarz,et al.  Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  L M Collins,et al.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.