Relative Importance of Rate and Place: Experiments Using Pitch Scaling Techniques with Cochlear Implant Recipients
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dirk Van Compernolle,et al. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] S Pijl. Pulse Rate Matching by Cochlear Implant Patients: Effects of Loudness Randomization and Electrode Position , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[3] M F Dorman,et al. The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] P J Blamey,et al. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] H J McDermott,et al. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] H J McDermott,et al. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] H J McDermott,et al. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] D W Schwarz,et al. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] L M Collins,et al. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.