Tool use by the forest ant Aphaenogaster rudis: Ecology and task allocation

Abstract.Debris dropping behavior by ants during foraging has been labeled alternately as tool use or a protective behavior. To address this controversy, we investigated the circumstances under which the common forest ant Aphaenogaster rudis drops and retrieves debris in the forests of Vermont, in the U.S.A. We tested the hypotheses, first, that debris dropping functions to protect workers from entanglement or drowning in liquids, and second, that debris dropping functions as part of foraging tool use. To determine how workers are allocated to the debris dropping and retrieval tasks, we studied individually marked foragers in the field and laboratory. Our results provide evidence that the debris dropping behavior of Aphaenogaster rudis deserves to be labeled as foraging tool use; A. rudis ants do not drop debris in non-food substances that present a hazard of entanglement or drowning to workers. We also found that potential tools represent a small, but non-negligible, percentage of the items that A. rudis foragers bring back to their colonies. Furthermore, debris dropping by A. rudis at baits discouraged colonization by other ant species. Finally, we provide the first evidence that tool use is a specialized task performed by a subset of A. rudis foragers within each colony at any given point in time. The execution of this task by a small proportion of workers may enhance the competitive ability of this ecologically dominant forest ant.

[1]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  BIOGEOGRAPHY AT A REGIONAL SCALE: DETERMINANTS OF ANT SPECIES DENSITY IN NEW ENGLAND BOGS AND FORESTS , 2002 .

[2]  John D. Pierce,et al.  Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--85: A Review of Tool Use in Insects , 1986 .

[3]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Behavioural ecology: Tool manufacture by naive juvenile crows , 2005, Nature.

[4]  G. Umphrey Morphometric discrimination among sibling species in the fulva–rudis–texana complex of the ant genus Aphaenogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1996 .

[5]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task partitioning in insect societies: novel situations , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.

[6]  Observations sur la récolte de substances liquides et de sucs animaux chez deux espèces d'Aphaenogaster: a. senilis eta. subterranea (Hym. Formicidae) , 1985, Insectes Sociaux.

[7]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task partitioning in insect societies , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  W. L. Morrill,et al.  Tool Using Behavior of Pogonomyrmex Badius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1972 .

[10]  Seasonal, successional, and vertical segregation in a Maryland ant community , 1981 .

[11]  M. Talbot Populations and Hibernating Conditions of the Ant Aphaenogaster (Attomyrma) Rudis Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1951 .

[12]  Jane Van Lawick-Goodall,et al.  The Behaviour of Free-living Chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve , 1968 .

[13]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Teaching in tandem-running ants , 2006, Nature.

[14]  A Functional Definition of Primate Tool-Making , 1969 .

[15]  J. Goodall,et al.  Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees , 1964, Nature.

[16]  E. Heithaus,et al.  Satiation in Collection of Myrmecochorous Diaspores by Colonies of Aphaenogaster rudis (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) in Central Ohio, USA , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[17]  R. Jeanne,et al.  Forager specialization and the control of nest repair in Polybia occidentalis Olivier (Hymenoptera : Vespidae) , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[20]  D. Culver,et al.  COLONY MOVEMENTS OF SOME NORTH AMERICAN ANTS , 1979 .

[21]  J. Herbers Community structure in north temperate ants: temporal and spatial variation , 1989, Oecologia.

[22]  J. H. Fellers,et al.  Tool Use in a Social Insect and Its Implications for Competitive Interactions , 1976, Science.

[23]  K. Burke Definition of Man , 1963 .

[24]  J. H. Fellers,et al.  Interference and Exploitation in a Guild of Woodland Ants , 1987 .

[25]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[26]  S. G. Vail,et al.  Foraging patterns in three sympatric forest ant species, Prenolepis imparis, Paratrechina melanderi and Aphaenogaster rudis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1980 .

[27]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Nest relocations in ants , 1982, Insectes Sociaux.

[28]  S. Cahan,et al.  Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  L. B. Thien,et al.  The use of tools for food transportation by the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  A. E. Headley A Population Study of the Ant Aphaenogaster Fulva Ssp. Aquia Buckley (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 1949 .

[31]  J. Alcock THE EVOLUTION OF THE USE OF TOOLS BY FEEDING ANIMALS , 1972, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  S. Suomi,et al.  Stone-Tool Bone-Surface Modification by Monkeys , 1994, Current Anthropology.