Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks

Cells are intrinsically noisy biochemical reactors: low reactant numbers can lead to significant statistical fluctuations in molecule numbers and reaction rates. Here we use an analytic model to investigate the emergent noise properties of genetic systems. We find for a single gene that noise is essentially determined at the translational level, and that the mean and variance of protein concentration can be independently controlled. The noise strength immediately following single gene induction is almost twice the final steady-state value. We find that fluctuations in the concentrations of a regulatory protein can propagate through a genetic cascade; translational noise control could explain the inefficient translation rates observed for genes encoding such regulatory proteins. For an autoregulatory protein, we demonstrate that negative feedback efficiently decreases system noise. The model can be used to predict the noise characteristics of networks of arbitrary connectivity. The general procedure is further illustrated for an autocatalytic protein and a bistable genetic switch. The analysis of intrinsic noise reveals biological roles of gene network structures and can lead to a deeper understanding of their evolutionary origin.

[1]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[2]  H. Riezman,et al.  Transcription and translation initiation frequencies of the Escherichia coli lac operon. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  O. Berg A model for the statistical fluctuations of protein numbers in a microbial population. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[5]  C. Chapon,et al.  Expression of malT, the regulator gene of the maltose region in Escherichia coli, is limited both at transcription and translation. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[6]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[7]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  W. McClure,et al.  Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. , 1985, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  M. Ko,et al.  A stochastic model for gene induction. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  P. van de Putte,et al.  DNA inversions in phages and bacteria. , 1992, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[11]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Interdependence of translation, transcription and mRNA degradation in the lacZ gene. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  M. Capp,et al.  Inhibition of Transcription Initiation buIacRepressor , 1995 .

[13]  C Reiss,et al.  Kinetic study in vitro of Escherichia coli promoter closure during transcription initiation. , 1995, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[15]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[16]  James C. Hu,et al.  Gene expression from plasmids containing the araBAD promoter at subsaturating inducer concentrations represents mixed populations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Thomas Record,et al.  RNA Polymerase-Promoter Interactions: the Comings and Goings of RNA Polymerase , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[21]  J. Keasling,et al.  Investigating autocatalytic gene expression systems through mechanistic modeling. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[24]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[25]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Random signal fluctuations can reduce random fluctuations in regulated components of chemical regulatory networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[27]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[28]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[29]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[30]  J. Hasty,et al.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Fluctuations in repressor control: thermodynamic constraints on stochastic focusing. , 2000, Biophysical journal.